The freedom of speech and expression has the benefit of enabling individuals to express, think, or get information from diverse sources without fear of reprisal or punishment. The sources could be publications and media, as well as the authorities and their agents. This freedom is considered the first prerequisite for autonomy because it occupies a preferential and critical place in the liberty hierarchy, providing support and protection for all other rights (Kaul 5). In a democratic country, freedom of speech and communication fosters open debate on contemporary topics and raises awareness of government crimes. This liberty is critical to the proper operation of representative democracy.
The majority of individuals in democratic governments highlight the importance of free expression. For instance, the United States Bill of Rights generally recognizes freedom of expression as a fundamental human right. These texts often emphasize that Congress is not expected to pass legislation restricting the free exercise of religion, curtailing freedom of expression or the press, or impeding people’s rights to associate peacefully. Each individual has the right to freedom of thought and expression. Therefore, everyone has the freedom to establish and hold their ideas free of interference. Additionally, individuals can communicate their beliefs or ideas via any medium, regardless of imposed constraints (Buck par. 5). In this scenario, entities can broadcast TV or operate cinemas independently of governmental intrusion. However, these liberties are expected to be accompanied by specific obligations and responsibilities. They are subject to the formalities, prohibitions, and punishments set by democratic society’s legislation.
The restrictions on the right to free speech can be supported by the disadvantage in the likelihood of some individuals using it negatively to insult others. For instance, some individuals could participate actions and expressions to insult those they perceive to be inferior in the workplace. Thus, while individuals may engage in certain activities to exercise their right to free speech, they should ensure that they do not hurt others’ feelings by communicating violent or offensive messages (Wilcox par. 1). Each individual should take responsibility for any communication directed to another person’s detriment. For instance, a speaker may make a slanderous remark or generate terror in some members of a community (Moore 34). In this light, the question arises whether one should limit a person’s power to sue another for the resulting damages.
Network media have surpassed the conventional media’s restrictions on freedom of expression, allowing individuals to enjoy expressing their thoughts and distributing information. This liberty confers several benefits on individuals, such as the ability to share information and view films. However, freedom of expression has been abused to foster hostile attitudes and intolerance toward persons with distinguishing qualities in society, resulting in an atmosphere of hatred. Americans today face a difficult choice about what it implies to have freedom of expression and where to make a distinction about what it protects. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right that ensures that all Americans can challenge the government and express their opinions without fear of censorship. Everyone should accept responsibility for any communication intended to cause harm to another person. For example, a speaker may make a defamatory remark or instill fear in certain members of society. For these simple reasons, America’s freedom of speech should be limited. This prevents bullying and harassment, extends education time, and lets people plan and interact peaceably.
Works Cited
Buck, Allison. “Confessions of a Bad Christian”. Odyssey, 12 Jan. 2016, www.theodysseyonline.com/confessions-bad-christian.
Kaul, Volker. “Freedom of Speech in Liberal and Non-Liberal Traditions.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 1, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1-11.
done in as little as 1 hour
Moore, James. “Assaults on Freedom of Speech: Why Social Studies Must Defend the First Amendment.” The Social Studies, vol. 113, no. 1, 2022, pp. 30-49.
Wilcox, Manon. “Why There Should Be Limits on Freedom of Speech?” Colors NewYork, Web.