Introduction
Military leaders need to guide and encourage their followers to develop appropriate abilities and philosophies that can support every mission. Nonetheless, such professionals will encounter various obstacles that have the potential to affect performance. Individual soldiers need to utilize new ways to measure their communication skills and improve them continuously. This discussion focuses on these issues and their relevance in every military unit.
Communication Challenge Discussions
Non-commissioned officers need to develop specific key competencies that can make them successful in their respective assignments. The leading ones include effective communication, leadership abilities, operations, and capability in program management (Lewińska, 2016). They should also consider the importance of various attributes if they are to emerge successful. The required qualities include compassion, courage, confidence, positive character, projection of mental and spiritual wellbeing to others, and a positive attitude.
In addition to these attributes, leaders in the military would be required to apply the best communication tactics and methods to ensure that all members are informed, well supported, and guided to complete their operations efficiently. The article “Operation OVERLOAD and the Principles of War” offers powerful insights regarding the best actions that commanders need to consider when managing dynamic or combined forces. The reader realizes that the concept of effective communication is applied efficiently to deliver victory. Nonetheless, some instances tend to occur that make the process ineffective or unsustainable (Seitz et al. 2002). The major communication challenge in this area is the inability to ensure that the presented information is available to all units within the stipulated time. When there is any form of delay, chances of failing will increase significantly.
When this challenge occurs, many leaders in the military would lack the best communication plan that can prevent the enemy from decoding the relayed information. In complex situations, leaders will be required to operate in areas with rough or unfriendly terrains and poor network connections. These scenarios mean that the intended communication process might be unable to deliver positive results. The challenge will also result in inappropriate coordination and make it impossible for the leaders to engage their followers and ensure that they rely on the disseminated information to pursue their goals (Seitz et al., 2002). Without proper guidance and involvement, communication breakdown might emerge and eventually affect the intended goals.
Personally, it is appropriate to apply evidence-based strategies to measure the effectiveness of my communication skill as a person involved in the military. The first method is tracking the level and nature of engagement when involved in a team. This approach will present key areas of strength and weakness that would require additional improvements. The second approach is encouraging my commanders and partners to provide timely insights and feedback in order to gauge my achievements (Lewińska, 2016). This knowledge will make it easier for me to make the relevant adjustments. Another initiative will be to engage in continuous learning and analyze best case studies of effective communication in the military. I will then make the relevant comparisons with my skills and pursue additional abilities.
Conclusion
The above discussion has identified the unique competencies that all non-commissioned officers need. Since leaders will encounter various communication challenges, it is appropriate that they consider emerging ideas to improve their models and eventually deliver victory. They should also measure their communication competencies and consider evidence-based strategies to improve their models accordingly. Commanders who take these recommendations seriously will achieve their goals much faster.
References
Lewińska, M. (2016). The role of communication in military leadership. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 2(1), 37-49. Web.
Seitz, S. S., Oakeley, K. M., & Garcia-Huidobro, F. C. (2002). Operation OVERLORD and the principles of war. Joint Forces Staff College.