Freedom of Speech Among Military Men and Women

Cite this


One of the public policy issues that face profound controversy is the freedom of speech among the military men and women. The American military characters possess the citizenship identities hence qualifying to enjoy the rights of a common nationality. However, in the case an officer offers in-depth information regarding war while on duty, the character risks significant disciplinary measure (Evans, 2015). It is crucial to note that despite the disciplinary measures to curb the counterparts’ decision to engage in a particular approach, there is profound impact during the implementation of the rules and regulations under dynamic clauses. The law provides a collision akin to that of taking photographs while in prison. Although national program offers individuals the capacity to take pictures of prisoners, the prison department prohibits the behavior while inside the facility. In this case, the dilemma arises regarding the moral and ethical value of the institution entities.

Taking Photographs in Prison

There is an interdependent relationship between public and departmental policy frameworks due to the causative nature of the interaction among the involved parties. On the one hand, the media seeks to practice its role by enhancing the optimal delivery of information to the public. On the other hand, the various divisions intend to uphold the internal welfare management concept. An excellent example is the abolition of taking photographs while in prison. The national blueprint, all citizens have the right to take photographs of the prisoners while in jail (Evans, 2015). However, the unit in charge with the management of the prisons indicates that all visitors are prohibited from taking pictures during the visitation. It is an indication that fosters the significant security and prevents the leakage of floor plans or the designs. The two approaches regarding camerawork pose proficient insight based on the conflict across the domain of the rules and protocols.

Display of Evidence

In a different spectrum, upholding the law entails incorporating dynamic approaches to enhance the concealment of crucial insights. According to the legal clause, police departments can display evidence for crime activities based on their perceptive approach (Evans, 2015). However, the news media are prohibited from demonstrating proof in an ongoing investigation and only permitted after getting a permit letter. It is a controversial phenomenon akin to the freedom of speech among the military. Acquiring adequate knowledge regarding criminal activities is an essential factor for the public. Nevertheless, the dynamic institutions implement mainframes that hinder the practice of the national regulatory concept. It is important to establish the margin that enshrines the exploitation of resources to avoid the violation of rules for either involved parties.

Crime Scene News Media Coverage

The news media play a vital role in the dissemination of critical information to the public regarding particular events such as crime scenes. Although the institution enjoys the right to collect real-time data and deliver to the consumers, it is a practice that encounters a controversial obstacle from the police department. According to the law enforcers, the allowance of a reporter in a crime scene is fifty meters to avoid interfering with the investigation process (Evans, 2015). The hindrance is an initiative to the organizational role of the industry responsible for delivering crucial details of ongoing activities.


Succinctly, the collision between departmental and public policy significantly affects the moral and ethical practice across the agencies. It is important to ensure the nationalities enjoy their rights and freedom. An excellent example is a military man willingly offering insights regarding the war. Although it is crucial to observe the nature of details disseminated, the characters get limited based on their career positions and responsibilities to the institutional domain. It is vital for the dynamic agencies to establish a platform that boosts the interdependence between the entities to elevate the functionalism.


Evans, W.B. (2015). Office of media relations-release of official information. Boston Police Department Rules and Procedures: Rule 300. 

Cite this paper

Select style


DemoEssays. (2023, February 4). Freedom of Speech Among Military Men and Women. Retrieved from


DemoEssays. (2023, February 4). Freedom of Speech Among Military Men and Women.

Work Cited

"Freedom of Speech Among Military Men and Women." DemoEssays, 4 Feb. 2023,


DemoEssays. (2023) 'Freedom of Speech Among Military Men and Women'. 4 February.


DemoEssays. 2023. "Freedom of Speech Among Military Men and Women." February 4, 2023.

1. DemoEssays. "Freedom of Speech Among Military Men and Women." February 4, 2023.


DemoEssays. "Freedom of Speech Among Military Men and Women." February 4, 2023.