Introduction
Law enforcement’s use of deadly force is a contentious topic that has been the subject of much discussion and controversy. Police work is inherently tricky, and officers frequently face dangerous situations that call for force, even lethal force. However, there has been widespread criticism of police use of fatal force because of questions about its appropriateness and possible abuse. The ethical implications of police use of fatal force are complex and call for an in-depth analysis of the many circumstances at play. The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of lethal force used by police, with an emphasis on the significance of ethical issues. It will examine the most pressing moral issues raised by police officers’ use of lethal force. The presentation aims to increase public trust and confidence in law enforcement by emphasizing the significance of promoting ethical standards in using deadly force.
Definition of Deadly Force
The term “deadly force” refers to the utilization of force that has the potential to result in severe physical injury or fatality. Rigorous legal criteria regulate the utilization of lethal force by law enforcement personnel. It is typically sanctioned solely when the officer reasonably believes such force is indispensable to safeguard themselves or others from impending danger. Utilizing lethal force can manifest in various ways, encompassing the deployment of firearms, tasers, batons, and other armaments. Distinct regulations and protocols govern the implementation of lethal force, and law enforcement personnel must receive adequate training in their proper application (Agency, 2021a). Comprehending the various forms of lethal force and the situations in which they may be employed is paramount in advancing ethical and efficient law enforcement methodologies.
Use of Force Continuum
The force continuum is a theoretical framework that delineates the varying degrees of force law enforcement personnel may employ in reaction to a particular circumstance. The continuum has been developed to furnish a structure for law enforcement officers to ascertain the suitable degree of force to be employed in a particular circumstance, contingent on the level of opposition encountered. The continuum of force comprises various levels, starting from verbal commands and physical presence, progressing to the utilization of non-lethal force like batons and tasers, and culminating in the application of lethal force (Agency, 2021b). Law enforcement officers must exercise their discretion and judgment to determine the appropriate level of force to be used, which should be proportional to the level of threat presented by the situation.
Justification for Deadly Force
The utilization of lethal force by law enforcement personnel is extensively governed by legal statutes and subject to rigorous legal criteria. Typically, lethal force is sanctioned solely when a law enforcement official has a rational belief that it is imperative to safeguard themselves or others from impending danger or to impede the flight of a suspect who poses a substantial menace to the welfare of the public (Agency, 2020b). When evaluating the appropriateness of lethal force, relevant factors may encompass the type of menace presented by the perpetrator, the gravity of the offense perpetrated, and the potential peril to society if the offender remains at large.
Types of Police Shootings
Police shootings can be classified into distinct categories, including justified, unjustified, accidental, and intentional. The concept of justified shootings pertains to instances where law enforcement officers employ lethal force in compliance with their legal mandate and training. Conversely, unjustified shootings refer to situations where officers use deadly force inappropriately or disproportionately. Inadvertent shootings are characterized by their unintended nature. In contrast, deliberate shootings are defined as using lethal force by law enforcement officials to cause harm or death (Banks, 2020). The ongoing concern and debate surrounding the prevalence of police shootings in the United States is a topic of academic interest.
Historical Context of Deadly Force
The historical context of deadly force in law enforcement can be traced back to the earliest forms of policing, where officers were authorized to use force as necessary to maintain order and authority. Multiple factors have contributed to the increase in the utilization of lethal force by law enforcement personnel. The augmentation of law enforcement agencies with military equipment and the expansion of imprisonment rates are some of the factors that have contributed to this phenomenon. The escalation of mass incarceration has engendered a contentious milieu between law enforcement and the constituencies they protect (Banks, 2020). Furthermore, militarization has resulted in a shift in the perception of police officers from public servants to soldiers, which has been linked to a rise in the utilization of lethal force.
Ethics and Deadly Force
Law enforcement personnel must utilize an appropriate level of force to neutralize a potential danger, and they should be responsible for their conduct. Ethical considerations can significantly influence the utilization of lethal force by the police (Banks, 2020). The conviction regarding the sacredness of human life could result in law enforcement officials exhibiting greater hesitancy towards resorting to lethal force, even in circumstances where such action may be deemed lawful. The principle of proportionality guides law enforcement officers to employ non-lethal measures, such as tasers or pepper spray, when lethal force is deemed unnecessary (Banks, 2020). The principle of accountability can incentivize law enforcement officers to exercise greater caution when employing lethal force, as they know they will be held responsible for their conduct.
Excessive Use of Force
The phenomenon of excessive use of force by law enforcement pertains to instances in which police officers employ a degree of force that surpasses what is required to manage a given situation, restrain a suspect, or safeguard themselves or others. The spectrum of violent behavior encompasses physical aggression, such as striking or shoving, and the application of lethal force. It can potentially result in bodily injury or fatality of uninvolved members of society, particularly those belonging to marginalized groups (Agency, 2021c). The circumstance above may give rise to a lack of confidence in law enforcement among impacted populations, ultimately culminating in societal turmoil and a deterioration of the rapport between police personnel and the communities they serve.
Racial Bias and Deadly Force
Racial prejudice in using lethal force by law enforcement has garnered substantial consideration in contemporary times. Studies have indicated that individuals belonging to minority racial and ethnic groups are at a higher risk of experiencing lethal force at the hands of law enforcement than their Caucasian counterparts. The ramifications of this partiality transcend isolated occurrences, exerting enduring repercussions on societies and the entirety of the legal system. The erosion of trust in law enforcement and the justice system and the perpetuation of systemic inequality are significant issues (Agency, 2021a). The resolution of racial bias in the application of lethal force necessitates a comprehensive strategy that encompasses responsibility, reformation of policies, and involvement of the community.
Police Training on Deadly Force
Law enforcement officers’ instruction on applying lethal force is a crucial component of police training. Law enforcement personnel receive comprehensive instruction on employing force hierarchy and lethal force, encompassing strategies and methodologies to mitigate confrontations before resorting to deadly force. Certain critics contend that the instruction provided to law enforcement officers is insufficient, antiquated, and fails to equip them with the necessary resources to exercise sound judgment when utilizing lethal force (Department of Justice, 2021). The topic of police training has been a matter of contention, with numerous interested parties advocating for extensive training overhauls to enhance the judgment of law enforcement personnel in situations involving lethal force.
Officer Accountability for Deadly Force
The accountability of law enforcement officers who employ lethal force has recently been subject to heightened scrutiny. Qualified immunity frequently safeguards law enforcement officials, posing a challenge for individuals or their relatives seeking to establish their liability. Possible measures to enhance officer accountability for lethal force include establishing independent investigations and forming boards composed of civilians to scrutinize incidents of shootings involving law enforcement officers (Department of Justice, 2021). Certain proponents have additionally advocated for alterations to qualified immunity statutes to facilitate the pursuit of legal recourse by aggrieved parties in civil litigation.
Police Response to Mental Health Crises
Law enforcement personnel frequently encounter individuals undergoing mental health crises, which can present difficulty for officers who may lack the requisite training or resources to manage such circumstances suitably. In certain instances, law enforcement personnel may utilize physical coercion, up to and including lethal force, when dealing with individuals undergoing a mental health emergency, resulting in unfortunate consequences. Various alternative strategies have been suggested to reduce the probability of using force and offer individuals the necessary care, including dispatching mental health experts to address such crises (Department of Justice, 2021). The successful implementation of these alternative approaches may necessitate augmented financial resources and enhanced cooperation between law enforcement and mental health practitioners.
Impact of Media on Perceptions of Deadly Force
The influence of the media on the public’s perception of the employment of deadly force by law enforcement is significant. The portrayal of an event by the media has the potential to either validate or challenge the justification for the application of deadly force. When the media depicts a police shooting as lacking justification, there is a potential for heightened public outcry and a corresponding demand for reform (Fridel, Sheppard, & Zimmerman, 2019). The general public’s perception regarding the utilization of deadly force by law enforcement is significantly influenced by the accuracy and impartiality of media reporting. The media must disseminate accurate information without sensationalism or misrepresenting the events they report on.
Community Engagement on Deadly Force
The importance of community engagement cannot be overstated in addressing matters about using lethal force by law enforcement personnel. The community’s involvement in decision-making is crucial for fostering trust and cultivating a favorable relationship between law enforcement and the community (NurPhoto, 2020). Diverse community engagement strategies, including community policing initiatives, citizen review boards, and town hall meetings, can be employed to achieve this objective (Fridel, Sheppard, & Zimmerman, 2019). Establishing a productive community engagement necessitates a mutual dedication from law enforcement personnel and community constituents to collaborate towards the advancement of constructive transformation and enhancement of public safety (Fridel, Sheppard, & Zimmerman, 2019). Through community engagement in deliberations and determinations about lethal force
Conclusion
In summary, using lethal force by law enforcement is a multifaceted matter that carries significant consequences for public safety and the confidence placed in law enforcement. Essential factors to consider are the influence of media on the general public’s perspectives, the necessity for unambiguous employment of force protocols, the significance of community involvement, and the possibility of non-deadly substitutes. Furthermore, it is imperative to consider the psychological well-being of law enforcement personnel and the influence of police unions on the development of protocols pertaining to lethal force.
References
Edwards, F., Lee, H., & Esposito, M. (2019). Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(34), 16793-16798. Web.
Fridel, E. E., Sheppard, K. G., & Zimmerman, G. M. (2019). Integrating the literature on police use of deadly force and police lethal victimization: How does place impact fatal police–citizen encounters? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(4), 957-992. Web.
Hill, M. (2021). The 5 best less lethal weapons for self-defense. Web.
Kim, D., Phillips, S. W., & Bishopp, S. A. (2021). Exploring the police use of force continuum with a partial proportional odds model. Policing: An International Journal, 45(2), 252-265. Web.
NurPhoto. (2020). A disabled man holds up his fist at the Lincoln Memorial during the… . Web.
Taylor, P. L. (2019). Dispatch priming and the police decision to use Deadly Force. Police Quarterly, 23(3), 311-332. Web.