Clinton and Trump Presidential Debate: Critical Analysis

The debate that took place in 2016 consisted of a more factual discussion of essential topics, such as domestic issues, including ranch excesses, financial arrangement, schools, bipartisan help, Communist exercises, and political experience. On the contrary, the 21st-century presidential debate was about more general concepts and did not stop on particular issues. Clinton and Trump talked more about their previous expertise and generic goals.

Nixon was recuperating from an emergency clinic visit and had a shadow and poor makeup on his face. His appearance and disposition contrarily influenced people’s impressions of his character. At the same time, Kennedy’s conveyance was smooth and appealing. Watchers paid attention to what they saw, not what they heard, which helped Kennedy win the election. Visual fringe prompts can affect devotees’ impression arrangement to the degree that a pioneer’s non-verbal communication and actual appearance abrogate reasonable judgment (Newman et al., 2016).

Emotions and body language characteristics change the impression that ought to be unbiased and objective, especially concerning whether a pioneer is clear, coordinated, and explicit while talking. Kennedy arises as to the case of a candidate whose quiet, levelheadedness and great looks outwardly recommend to supporters that he is more transparent, coordinated, skillful, and pleasant than Candidate Nixon.

Clinton and Trump have been brilliant illustrations of two official American competitors on direct inverse sides of the correspondence range, and each engaged altogether different gatherings of electors. Clinton’s contentions are frequently based on her long experience in law, legislative issues, and government while simultaneously excusing Trump’s capabilities. She also preferred numbers during her mission, peppering measurements and study results throughout her discourses. Trump depended vigorously on the passionate reaction from his supporters. He attempted to mix enthusiasm and outrage among his allies who felt hard done by their nation and the Obama organization.

Despite the sketchy realities and the troublesome yelling, pointing, and ridiculing approach, Trump had the option to persuade the electing school that the American system had flaws. He was the one in particular who could change the situation. The later presidential debate was more persuasive because the speakers could effectively use many tools of effective public performance. Nixon and Kennedy were the first presidents to debate on TV; hence, they were unaware of the best ways to appear on the screen. Even though they integrated many factual data in their speeches, it was difficult to convey emotions through the camera.

A person’s non-verbal behavior is inextricably linked with the mental state and serves as a means of expression. Messages transmitted on a non-verbal level most often express a person’s attitude towards what he or she is saying. Scientific research shows that the speaker’s words have minimal impact on listeners compared to how he or she uses the voice (Newman et al., 2016). In a big crowd, a person is gullible, prone to depersonalization, incapable of criticism, see everything in unambiguous paints, and reacts to emotions (Newman et al., 2016).

The debate format is significant for the public’s perception of a leader, particularly in a reality where present-day innovation builds devotees’ visual openness to a speaker through broadcast discussions, public interviews, and discourses. Speakers ought to deliberately underline positive visible fringe signs when talking. Exhibiting successive cheerful visual fringe prompts, for example, showing certainty through alluring emotionality, non-verbal communication, or looking appealing, cultivates devotees’ good impressions and urges adherents to pay attention to and support a candidate.


Newman, R., Furnham, A., Weis, L., Gee, M., Cardos, R., Lay, A., & McClelland, A. (2016). Non-verbal presence: How changing your behavior can increase your persuasion, leadership, and confidence ratings. Psychology, 07(04), 488–499. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style


DemoEssays. (2022, December 22). Clinton and Trump Presidential Debate: Critical Analysis. Retrieved from


DemoEssays. (2022, December 22). Clinton and Trump Presidential Debate: Critical Analysis.

Work Cited

"Clinton and Trump Presidential Debate: Critical Analysis." DemoEssays, 22 Dec. 2022,


DemoEssays. (2022) 'Clinton and Trump Presidential Debate: Critical Analysis'. 22 December.


DemoEssays. 2022. "Clinton and Trump Presidential Debate: Critical Analysis." December 22, 2022.

1. DemoEssays. "Clinton and Trump Presidential Debate: Critical Analysis." December 22, 2022.


DemoEssays. "Clinton and Trump Presidential Debate: Critical Analysis." December 22, 2022.