Introduction
The lawful drinking age in the US has been a topic of concern and regulation for a long time. The enactment of the Minimum Legal Drinking Age (MLDA) law in 1984 was implemented through the Federal Uniform Drinking Age Act, which set 21 as the legal drinking age nationwide (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2022). However, there is the question of the law’s effectiveness and fairness, as it continues to spark controversy, with supporters and opponents offering different arguments.
This essay will focus on whether the legal drinking age should be lowered to 18 or kept at 21. The paper strives to present a balanced insight into the subject as well as the consequences of social behavior, alcohol-related risks, and responsibility among young adults. This comprehensive exploration will shed light on the complexities surrounding the drinking age debate and provide a foundation for informed decision-making. The working thesis takes a stance on the potential impacts of lowering the drinking age and sets the stage for a structured and evidence-based argument that will be developed through the course of the study.
Alcohol Effects on Social Behavior
Alcohol consumption among young adults significantly influences social interactions and peer dynamics. Iwamoto & Smiler (2013 explain that peer pressure can lead to increased alcohol consumption as individuals strive to fit in and avoid social exclusion. Their study also found that individuals who were more susceptible to peer pressure use alcohol more often, especially among males. This is because they want to affirm masculine norms of heterosexual display, less emotional control, and Playboy (Iwamoto & Smiler, 2013). Many social activities, such as parties and celebrations, revolve around alcohol consumption, which fosters a culture that normalizes and encourages drinking.
Comparing social behavior between age groups reveals distinct patterns in alcohol consumption and its impact on social norms. A study by Dawson et al. (2014) recorded a large, significant increase in average daily volume (ADV) among individuals aged 25-44 years. The authors recorded that adults 65 and older had the largest increase in heavy episodic drinking (HED), which increased from 6.1% to 11.8% (Dawson et al., 2014). Individuals between the 18-24 age bracket had a reduced proportion of HED and ADV, which suggests that younger adults practice responsible drinking. This difference in alcohol consumption patterns highlights that young adults are not as vulnerable to the negative consequences of alcohol misuse.
Moreover, young adults are gradually perceiving alcohol consumption as “uncool” and are engaging in alternative social activities like gaming and adopting healthy lifestyles (MĂĄnsson et al., 2022). Therefore, the concerns surrounding excessive consumption among younger adults can recede since they are establishing more boundaries with alcohol use. This presents a hopeful future for youth, with the possibility of becoming responsible and accountable individuals in adulthood.
Alcohol-Induced Incidents
Alcohol-related accidents and fatalities pose significant concerns, particularly among young adults. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2022) states that in people aged 20–39 years, about 13.5% of total deaths are attributable to alcohol. A study by Barnett et al. (2006) showed that excessive alcohol use in college students is linked to physical illness, unintentional injury, and behavioral problems like decrements in academic performance. Additionally, the proportion of crimes related to alcohol consumption, from 2005 to 2014 in the US was 15% (Lagazzi & Surtayeva, 2019).
The implications of alcohol-related incidents extend beyond individual harm to encompass broader concerns for law enforcement and public safety. Law enforcement authorities experience major problems checking up on alcohol-related rules and regulations, particularly young people’s access to alcohol. Preventing or reducing the risks of driving-related incidents should involve using education and regulation as a joint strategy. Comprehensive alcohol education programs can focus on enlightening the youth about the consequences of abusive alcohol use and responsible drinking. This can, in turn, curb high-risk drinking among the younger population.
Strategies to Address the Issue
Drinking Age Legislation
Barnett et al. (2006) suggest that college students involved with alcohol use need an intervention that would shift their motivation and provide a concrete plan and education about strategies that reduce harm. Another effective tool is the imposition of laws and regulations regarding underage drinking and impaired driving to discourage individuals from engaging in such behaviors and reduce alcohol-related incidents. Additionally, according to Barnett et al. (2006), cases that students reported to authorities provided an opportunity for them to examine and modify their drinking behaviors. Policymakers can join forces with evidence-based strategies to educate young adults and strictly enforce the regulations that can curtail the risks associated with alcohol consumption and eventually foster public safety.
Examining the relationship between age and responsibility will help clarify the reasons for the debate over the appropriate drinking age. Young people learn how to make decisions and take up responsibility as they move to adulthood. Youth in the 18-21 age bracket gain new experiences involving freedom, responsibility, civic duty, and patriotism. This plays a crucial role in their personal development. They are exposed to most adult responsibilities by society, and the government expects them to make informed choices and adhere to acceptable norms.
Creating uniform legislation on the drinking age and other aspects of adulthood at 18 will help shape the young adults’ sense of responsibility. Beyond that, the long-term effects on the behavior and decision-making of this alignment can be considered because they might affect the attitudes of people toward the use of alcohol and general risk-taking behavior. Setting the drinking age at 18 can foster maturity and responsibility among young adults by aligning with their rights and duties.
Mynttinen et al. (2021) did a study on adolescents’ perceptions of alcohol, and they pointed out that the majority of them see imposing rules and regulations in terms of drinking as not helpful in preventing them from drinking. Some of them noted that strict prohibition by parents, rigorous rules, and punishment normally led to undesirable drinking since they felt defiant ( Mynttinen et al., 2021). The youngsters may see the 21-year rule as inadequate because the strict laws against alcohol usage by adults under 21 result in defiant behavior or rebelliousness. Hence, giving young adults legal permission to drink alcohol at the age of 18 will be an acknowledgment that authorities trust young people to exercise the right decision-making.
Educating on Consequences of Alcohol Use
Providing education about the dangers associated with underage drinking and taking proactive steps to develop responsible alcohol consumption can promote safer communities. It also paves the way for young adults to make an educated decision on alcohol consumption. The issue of underage drinking poses severe health and safety concerns for the public to date. Research shows that out of adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years, 2.5 percent have alcohol use disorders (Lagazzi & Surtayeva, 2019). It is a challenge for law enforcement agencies to enforce the drinking age law and stop alcohol access among underage individuals.
Establishing and enforcing alcohol harm reduction approaches will give the youth the right opportunity to make responsible and sensible choices surrounding alcohol consumption. A study by Ahammer et al. (2021) investigated the efficacy of Austria’s MLDA, which is set at 16. It revealed that young adults can drink responsibly, but the number of alcohol-related incidents increased. Moreover, the study showed that the discontinuous increase in alcohol consumption at the age of 16 meant that MLDA legislation had a definite impact on preventing most (but not all) underage children from drinking alcohol (Ahammer et al., 2021).
This, in turn, showcases the fact that the effects of allowing 18-year-olds to drink can be twofold. It can provide the youth with an opportunity for maturity and eliminate underage drinking, but there would be an increase in incidents related to drinking. Further, lessening the drinking age will also make drinking a norm in controlled environments, including regulated places with strict serving rules. These measures can help reduce the prevalence of hazardous drinking and strengthen moderate, responsible behavior among young adults.
Those who oppose the shifting of the existing drinking age legislation argue that these changes will result in alcohol abuse and impaired driving among young adults. APHA (2019) asserts that alcohol consumption is a major public health hazard among people, 15-59 years of age, who are prone to early mortality and disabilities. In addition, excessive drinking costs the United States $249 billion in the year 2010, and 2.3 million years of potential life were lost (APHA, 2019). On the flip side, a drop in the minimum age may encourage responsible drinking and decrease voluntary defiance tendencies from underage groups. Cultural attitudes toward alcohol consumption have a big effect on social norms and behavior.
In societies where drinking is deeply ingrained in their culture, modifying the drinking age could result in resistance due to the fear of disrupting the established principles. Offering education and regulations that counter these societal issues can be effective. Conducting alcohol education programs and regulating alcohol sales and advertising will change the social perspective toward responsible drinking. APHA (2019) recommends that laws be developed at the federal, state, or local levels and that they provide alcohol distributors with the training needed to ensure they serve or sell alcohol responsibly. This will help in reducing the negative effects of changing the drinking age on society.
Conclusion
The argument over whether the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen years old or kept at twenty-one years old has resulted in different standpoints and opinions. This essay has explored the range of consequences associated with changes in drinking-age regulations. It has covered the issues of social behavior, health, safety, and young adult responsibility, as well as alternative points. Reducing the drinking age to 18 could foster appropriate behavior among young adults by creating a legal framework that gives them the same obligations and privileges as adults.
Nevertheless, there are many apprehensions concerning the possible negative impacts, such as abuse of alcohol and impaired driving. Such issues can be handled through education, regulation, and cultural transformation. Lowering the drinking age is a two-sided issue that should be implemented with caution and takes both probable positive and negative impacts into account. In conclusion, the thesis remains that the drinking age needs to be lowered to 18 to provide an opportunity that allows mature behavior, responsible drinking, and safe drinking among young adults.
References
Ahammer, A., Bauernschuster, S., Halla, M., & Lachenmaier, H. (2021). Minimum legal drinking age and the social gradient in binge drinking. Journal of Health Economics, 81.
American Public Health Association (APHA). (2019). Addressing alcohol-related harms: A population level response.
Barnett, N. P., Goldstein, A. L., Murphy, J. G., Colby, S. M., & Monti, P. M. (2006). “I’ll never drink like that again”: Characteristics of alcohol-related incidents and predictors of motivation to change in college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(5), 754–763.
Dawson, D. A., Goldstein, R. B., Saha, T. D., & Grant, B. F. (2015). Changes in alcohol consumption: United States, 2001–2002 to 2012–2013. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 148, 56–61.
Iwamoto, D. K., & Smiler, A. P. (2013). Alcohol makes you macho and helps you make friends: The role of masculine norms and peer pressure in adolescent boys’ and girls’ alcohol use. Substance Use & Misuse, 48(5), 371–378.
Lagazzi, B. A., & Surtayeva, T. (2019). Increasing the minimal age of consumption of alcohol decreases the number of alcohol-related costs in the US. University of Economics in Prague.
MĂĄnsson, J., Samuelsson, E., & Törrönen, J. (2022). Doing adulthood—doing alcohol: What happens when the ‘sober generation’ grows up? Journal of Youth Studies, 25(1), 84-99.
Mynttinen, M. A., Mishina, K. E., & Kangasniemi, M. K. (2021). Adolescents’ perceptions and experiences of their responsibilities for their alcohol use—A group interview study. Children, 8(3).
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). (2022). Alcohol policy.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Alcohol.