Language plays a crucial role within any social context of human interaction. Therefore, the power of language, which was emphasized by post-structuralism, is critical within the discourse of foreign policy and international relations. According to post-structuralists, discourse refers to linguistic systems via which meaning is created (Hansen, 2016). In foreign policy, it is also the tool utilized by political entities that strive to demonstrate a particular image in contrast with other states (Hansen, 2016). Consequently, it is possible to deduct that foreign policy is based on specific representations of the nations, locations, and people that such policies aid or discourage, as well as representations of the national or institutional Self that implements these policies. Language is the primary medium for such representations, but it is not limited to a channel that merely communicates the factual reality. It is closer to a specific practice. Consequently, the discourse analysis should not be concerned with the truthfulness of assertions but rather with identities, values, and norms are being formed through language. As a result, foreign policy can be perceived as a discursive practice.
The role of discourse analysis is to distinguish the contrasting issues at hand. It is done by representational practices that analyze ongoing discourses from numerous sources such as journalists, media, policymakers, politicians, and scholars (Hansen, 2016). Consequently, it is possible to draw conclusions about a particular country’s image and vision. For example, US representations are not neutral and construct a US-centered vision where the positive representation of US foreign policy implies that local interests are prioritized while others are marginalized (Hansen, 2016). On the other hand, foreign policies of US enemies are considered negative. Thus, the role of discourse within foreign policies represents the practical reality of international relations.
Reference
Hansen, L. (2016). Discourse analysis, post-structuralism, and foreign policy. Foreign policy: Theories, actors, cases, 2, 94-109.