Introduction
To preserve public safety and conduct successful law enforcement, police organizations and the societies they serve must have a relationship based on mutual trust. To gather information about crime in their communities and to collaborate with law enforcement entities in finding solutions to crime and disturbance concerns, police officers rely on community members’ assistance (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). Likewise, whether or not residents are inclined to trust the police is based on whether they think that the latter’s activities uphold legal and fair procedural standards as well as communal values. Community policy is an essential piece in upholding the civil security and implementation of law, which is beneficial for societal development.
The establishment of community policing increases the public’s trust in the authority charged with upholding the law. In an effort to protect the law and discourage crime, this field, as opposed to traditional enforcement, focuses a significant emphasis on citizen involvement (Williams et al., 2018). In the 1980s, America adopted the ground-breaking method of community policing (Brown, 2018). Since then, not much has changed in terms of the law enforcement in this country. The main goal of this kind of policing is to improve ties between the police and the society. While patrol police are permitted to respond to crime complaints, their units are designed to handle minor issues in the public sphere in order to improve internal security. By collaborating with the general public, the community police’s primary goal is to ensure that everyone in society is safe.
A key component of community policing is developing society with ideals, which include encouraging citizen involvement in decisions that have a serious impact on local safety and quality of life. By doing this, the police department develops a culture that not only values societal engagement but also works to structure and run its operations in a manner that is compatible with those values (Williams et al., 2018). The foundation of community policing is creating a distinct, unmistakable link between principles and actions. Seemingly abstract values may be given a practical operational meaning by developing a performance assessment system. Trust, collaboration, communication, honesty, initiative, discretion, accountability, respect, and a stronger commitment to public safety are the guiding principles that are the essence of the field (Madsen & Kammersgaard, 2022). The foundation of assessment methods that are congruent with the activities and behaviors of community policing will be a brief mission statement that represents these principles and is widely developed among staff, local governments, and community people.
Overview of Community Policing
The precise definition of community policing is frequently unclear. In addition, it is unclear if this improves or worsens the relationship between the public and law enforcement. Programs for community policing, which theoretically represent new policing initiatives and tactics, can be put into action in a number of different ways. For instance, it includes “zero tolerance” programs, where police officers choose to blatantly enforce the law, and programs where the officer’s main objective is to forge intimate ties with the public (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). Thus, depending on their background and perspective, individuals may perceive this field in different ways.
Despite the fact that community policing has been given many various meanings, its flexible and adaptable qualities allow for all of these variations. The collaboration between the public and law enforcement officers in identifying criminal activities in the society is one of the key characteristics of the field that many experts view to be essential (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). Inherently, community policing is a facilitative law enforcement function where citizens are urged to assist (Peyton et al., 2019). Both authorities and the general public will gain from its appropriate understanding and use, which will build society and its security.
The field’s approaches appear to have more of an influence on decreasing fear than on reducing crime, despite the fact that this is their stated purpose. The dread brought on by criminal activity decreases as a result of law enforcement authorities developing relationships with the society and the police, which increases public trust (Rahn, 2019). Everyone in the community is more likely to cooperate with law enforcement to halt criminal activity when both the public and the police are viewed with confidence.
Another important objective of community policing is to improve ties between the general population and law enforcement, which can be helpful for spotting criminal behavior rather than discouraging it. If people in a community cannot accept police engagement and the tactics used, then the process will be futile; law enforcement personnel must be accepted by the society they are intended to protect and serve (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). The paper gives a general review of community policing and demonstrates how this influences how the police interact with society.
Community Policy Framework
The four key components of the community policing framework are organizational, tactical, strategic, and philosophical. Each of these factors has a unique function in comprehending the field. Community policing’s purpose is to approach policing broadly rather than concentrating exclusively on law enforcement and crime control (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). Included in this is the notion of modifying the field in accordance with the internal values, norms, and requirements of the populace.
The major operational ideas for putting the philosophy into practice are included in the strategic framework. It is defined by features including an emphasis on prevention, a spatial focus, and a reorientation of activities (Williams et al., 2018). Law enforcement is being urged by the reorientation operations component to rely less on police cars and focus more on direct physical contact with the population. Officers should focus more on place than the time when doing their jobs, according to the theory of geographic emphasis (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). To become more accustomed to the community, law enforcement personnel must spend a lot of time in one location. As an outcome, it becomes easier to carry out their responsibility of ensuring everyone’s safety. The focus on prevention implies a more proactive approach than a reactive one (Saharuddin et al., 2022). These components are essential to ensuring a good, mutually beneficial connection between the public and local police personnel.
Strategies, ideologies, and concepts are transformed into actionable practices and programs via the tactical framework aspect. This typically takes the shape of ideas like constructive contact and the creation of alliances. Partnerships entail officers looking for a partnership with the public in identifying community issues and soliciting their input as well as participation in proposed measures (Williams et al., 2018). Positive engagement encourages law enforcement personnel to engage with the public in a positive way in order to build trust. This involves community involvement and feedback, law enforcement collaboration with other outside agencies, and public policing of officers in different leadership roles.
Management, structure, and information make up an organizational framework of community policing. Management encompasses a variety of leadership, supervisory, and management philosophies that are strongly influenced by company principles and culture. These management techniques include encouraging officers to innovate and be creative rather than limiting their roles to following rules and regulations, mentoring on what it means to be a good officer, and separating intentional mistakes from those that were made accidentally (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). The hierarchy’s levels are leveled, collaboration is encouraged, and power is delegated (Williams et al., 2018). The data emphasize the significance of information systems that support the detection and analysis of issues at the community level (Peyton et al., 2019). These organizational dimension components are crucial since they ultimately determine whether it will succeed or fail.
Principles Beneficial for the Community
Community policing develops relationships and mutual trust, which makes society safer. Due to recent incidents of police employing force and other issues, the legitimacy of law enforcement has been called into doubt in many locations. There are some important guidelines that must be followed when putting this field into practice. Transparency is key to building trust between the police and the society. In order to prevent conveying the appearance that information is being withheld from the community on purpose, authorities should endeavor to disseminate as much information about a noteworthy occurrence as early as they can (Williams et al., 2018). Furthermore, it is critical to emphasize that the first information that appears after a catastrophic event is preliminary and subject to change when new information becomes available (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). Police officers must advise the public and the media that early reports may be inaccurate and must correct any mistakes as soon as they are discovered. Departments should regularly post information on their policies on the use of force, complaints from the public, and other issues on their websites. Access to this information should be free and straightforward for the community.
In order to show their dedication to quality in law enforcement, agencies may also think about applying for accreditation. By establishing external monitoring mechanisms like independent auditors or external review boards to handle internal affairs inquiries, institutions may also show openness and accountability (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). To maintain constitutional policing, local police forces should offer comprehensive information on best practices. Determinations, case summaries, letters of finding, and other publicly accessible records, for instance, reflect changes to policy, instruction, and practice in areas like the use of force by police (Carter & Fox, 2018). The detection, management, and monitoring of possible issues with officer conduct or bias in law enforcement is another crucial subject that has to be mentioned. A fundamental idea that serves both the general public and the police department is transparency and openness to the public.
Adopting steps to improve cultural competency and decrease bias in community policing is another critical factor. Many police and civil rights activists emphasize the importance of providing training on diversity, unconscious bias, and cultural competency to all staff (Peyton et al., 2019). It is crucial for law enforcement officers to be able to interact with varied groups and comprehend their cultural norms because many cities and towns contain communities with a variety of racial and ethnic backgrounds. Police departments should teach new employees and current staff about implicit prejudice and cultural sensitivity (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). People are driven to practice non-judgmental conduct once they become aware of their underlying prejudices. By doing this, it will boost trust between various communities and police forces.
Another crucial element of the field is acknowledging and addressing with society the challenges that police organizations may face. Controversial use of force and other scenarios might harm relationships between the police and the public. The reputation of the law enforcement forces worldwide as well as the relationship between the police and the local communities can occasionally be negatively impacted by an alleged serious act of misconduct by a single officer in a city. Thus, they must take into account the history of racial minorities and people who have endured injustice at the hands of the force (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). Furthermore, the police must never downplay the issues that individuals have had with them.
Due to the past subordination and unfair treatment by law enforcement, African Americans have formed an apprehension and hostility towards these entities. The attitudes of many individuals about the police were represented in this narrative. All law enforcement personnel must be aware of the history and accountable for it, which calls to acknowledge that certain people’s attitudes regarding the police are genuinely influenced by this past. And when considering more recent history, officers should be aware that problems like racial inequity are also at the foundation of some community members’ fear of the police.
In addition, a number of modern policing methods and practices, such as the abuse of stop and frisk procedures in some offices, have increased minority communities’ mistrust of the police. This strategy brings up racial prejudice concerns that dominate the debate over police use of force (Basham, 2021). Community leaders believe that in order to protect community members’ interests, such interventions should happen very away. They say this is because people might not have confidence in the processes in place to look into complaints involving internal police matters.
Adopting a policing perspective that goes beyond the usual law enforcement emphasis is required when working within the community policing perspective. This broader perspective acknowledges the importance of actions that improve the neighborhood’s order and well-being. Helping accident or crime victims, providing medical care, resolving, defending the exercise of constitutional rights, and setting an example of citizenship are some examples of these activities.
The Importance of the Problem-Solving Approach
Societal concerns must be addressed and validated for the community policing method to work well. Law enforcement and neighbourhood organizations may not always agree on which specific problems need to be addressed first. Serious concerns should also be addressed via community policing. In essence, community policing enables local residents to bring serious concerns to the police’s notice. The police should cooperate with the public to address concerns in the society after becoming aware of them while also enlisting the public’s assistance in resolving problems that affect the law enforcement.
Due to the problem-solving method’s efficiency, there is a growing understanding that community engagement is crucial to its success. Understanding society as its whole is essential for identifying the underlying causes of crime (Giwa, 2018). As a result, successful public and police efforts to resolve issues will benefit from community engagement in identifying and defining priorities. Together, we can solve issues that foster confidence, information sharing, and the discovery of further issues that could need joint police and community attention.
In these circumstances, problem-solving relies on the assistance of both the police and the community. Accepting it may result in the problem being resolved entirely, occurring less frequently, or being resolved more effectively. There are different solutions ranging from straightforward, low-cost steps to intricate, long-term fixes that demand a large investment of time and money (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). The participants’ imagination, ingenuity, tenacity, and excitement are the only boundaries to problem solutions. The use of community policing enables problems to be addressed in a way that is unique to each society. The correct solutions are those that satisfy community members, boost safety, promote more order, improve relations between the law enforcement staff and the public, and eliminate coercion.
For collaborative police and societal initiatives to tackle problems, patrol personnel serve as catalysts. They interact with the community frequently, are aware of its unique physical and social characteristics, are knowledgeable about local issues, and can support community members in voicing their needs when appropriate (Tobón, 2021). Many neighborhood problems may be effectively resolved by patrol officers, their supervisors, and area residents. Problem-solving should involve all levels of the law enforcement organization, depending on the size and importance of the issue (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). For instance, dealing with serious spousal abuse situations that span many cities within the agency’s jurisdiction would need numerous levels of police oversight. Alcohol addicts may be compelled by a local agency to take part in rehabilitation programs. In the interim, intermediate and senior police officers, community leaders, and women’s groups may explore the provision of temporary housing and counseling for victims and their families (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). It is highlighted that a variety of social and governmental institutions, as well as regional resources, are utilized in the process of problem-solving.
By tackling issues at the grassroots level, community policing focuses on addressing the causes of crime. Widespread community support is necessary for these alternative solutions. The inhabitants must be informed about the problem’s nature and other emergency responses before the police may have this help (Carter & Fox, 2018). Before community members embrace alternative solutions, they must be clearly articulated. Residents must have faith that the police will act swiftly in response to their emergency requests.
Proper Implementation of Community Policing
The entire corporation may launch community policing at initially, or just a certain division or area. To get agency-wide commitment, every aspect of operation will need to be examined. A number of systems will need to be changed in order to accommodate greater job responsibilities and foster productive connections with the public. It will take a lot of endurance, perseverance, and resolve to undergo this type of metamorphosis. Organization-wide deployment might not be feasible for institutions with significant linkages to traditional policing tactics (Carter & Fox, 2018). The establishment of the essential support systems, community ties, and worker training will take time. Implementation throughout one or more districts or areas might serve to demonstrate the success and create important data for extending community-wide policing, even if it could need more time and effort than adoption inside a specialized unit (Williams et al., 2018). Police in the target district, however, can help to educate others as community policing spreads throughout the organization (Cossyleon, 2019). Another advantage is that district implementation necessitates coordinated efforts from all governmental levels. It is crucial to keep in mind that the community police district does more than simply supplement existing police procedures.
How community policing objectives are originally articulated will determine how well the framework is implemented across an organization. Competition and division may result if agency officials indicate that community policing in a particular unit or area is a test to see if this strategy should be applied across the board (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). The implementation of agency-wide law enforcement must begin in a particular unit or district, not as a test site, according to managers, who must make this apparent. The process of putting into practice this approach must be fluid and dynamic. To maintain community policing, it is crucial to have ongoing input, assessment, and feedback from both inside and outside the policing agency (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). To ensure optimal performance, every aspect of the field must be meticulously planned and scheduled; even brilliant ideas might fail if improperly carried out. Planning must accommodate shifting priorities, situations, and requirements. A strong aptitude for research and planning that is receptive to criticism and ideas will enable adjustments and changes throughout implementation (Braga et al., 2019). For community policing to be successful, this adaptability is essential.
Officers and oversight organizations frequently request help from local government departments for services ranging from sanitation to healthcare, therefore, cooperation between the police department and local government representatives is crucial. Regular engagement with government officials will help enlist their assistance and allow them to equip their personnel for future service demands (Williams et al., 2018). Both the public and community police personnel will gain from this.
How effectively community policing changes the legal profession in the long run will depend on how eager local governments are to achieve successful integration. The plan for implementing law enforcement must be known to and participated in by administrators who have been elected or appointed. Mayors, city managers, parliamentarians, and other public officials should take the initiative to expand this trend toward community-based governance at the local level; they should not merely be spectators to the proceedings (Williams et al., 2018). Just as the law enforcement personnel must choose how to react to and address crime and violence, political leaders and service providers must find ways to dedicate all available resources toward addressing these urgent social concerns (Malay, 2021). These agencies alone lack the ability to manage all of today’s problems, community policing may serve as a catalyst for resource mobilization at various levels to better address these concerns.
Community policing may be first implemented by the entire organization or just a particular division or region. All operational facets will need to be reviewed due to general government obligations. To support increased work duties and develop fruitful interactions with the community, several systems will need to be reorganized (Williams et al., 2018). This kind of transformation will need a lot of patience, tenacity, and determination. For institutions with strong ties to present police methods, organization-wide deployment may not be possible (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). It will take time to properly train workers, establish ties with the community, and create the necessary support networks. The length of time needed will be different based on the organization’s present direction, its past interactions with the community, and the resources available.
The deployment of community policing by a committed, well-trained unit frequently exhibits the first positive results and draws the attention from the public to the positive aspects of the framework. However, caution must be exercised to prevent causing dissent inside the organization. Efforts can be severely hindered if it is viewed as being the only responsibility of a specialized unit inside the organization (Carter & Fox, 2018). The idea that a new approach to the police does not necessarily need to be integrated with all other areas of operations might also result from organizing community policing through a specialized unit (Kremlin & Parsons, 2020). Feedback is crucial no matter which strategy is employed. Institutions may experience implementation issues that may have been avoided if they received proper input. This strategy will undoubtedly involve mistakes, and a well-thought feedback method should include the identification of mistakes, their prompt eradication, and the learning that results from them.
Human Resource Development in Community Policing
Effective community policing depends on training and development. Training should encourage consensus, resolve, and unity both inside and beyond the police organization. It should educate and reinforce changes in organizational beliefs and policies. The skills of the framework should be taught as part of the core curriculum rather than as a stand-alone subject (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). Complementing law enforcement tactics with leadership and communication skills that will promote social involvement is the goal of community policing training (Williams et al., 2018). Each employee must be proficient in teamwork, motivation, and problem-solving techniques. Civilian staff members who can interact with the public and integrate cutting-edge technology into the organization’s service-oriented operations should be included in the agency-wide training.
An important deviation from conventional wisdom is the substantial training that patrol officers must get. This training promotes and develops initiative and discretion. Through ongoing, demanding training, staff must strengthen their organizing, problem-solving, communication, and leadership abilities (Gascón & Roussell, 2019). They should be counted on to communicate with others and explain new ideas to individuals they engage with. Additionally, management should think about broadening the requirements for the current rewards program and emphasizing collaboration with the community and problem-solving abilities (Peyton et al., 2019). To assist in choosing the recipients of police awards, several agencies have invited members of the community (Carter & Fox, 2018). Others provide additional incentives to those who help the police in their communities. These systems of benefits will support dedication and promote more collaboration among community policing stakeholders.
Conclusions
An important milestone in American history of enforcing the law is community policing. Its popularity and prevalence in contemporary police continue to raise questions, nevertheless. By emphasizing the complexity of policing duties and tasks, the framework essentially undermines the widespread belief that law enforcement’s role is to fight crime. Police officers’ main responsibility is to make the society safer, but they also need to be problem solvers and community builders. However, community policing sometimes finds it challenging to foster effective ties between local residents and police personnel.
Police agencies should also be careful to prevent the public and political figures from having irrational expectations of how quickly or effectively the framework would be implemented. It is not a temporary remedy; it takes ongoing commitment. It will take strategy, adaptability, time, and patience to address the fundamental causes of crime and build lasting relationships with the public. The shift to community policing, as well as each choice made and every action done, should be guided by the organization’s ideals. Above all, from the beginning of the field, policing organizations must be responsive to community objectives and service requirements. A police organization will be able to create metrics that correctly represent accomplishments and failures and highlight areas that require adjustment if it has a wealth of policing expertise.
Management should foster the idea that success is attained via a series of incremental changes both inside and outside the business and may assess progress against its performance in attaining intermediate goals. Police leadership must make it plain to city and county authorities that the adoption of community policing is a gradual and long-term process, even when local political leadership may be seeking immediate results. Implementing community policing should be a top priority in most places since it helps both local citizens and police officers. All communities should have equal access to police services, hence no neighborhood should be given precedence over another. However, equality may not necessarily imply a fair allocation of police support staff and equipment. Some areas will naturally have higher crime rates, necessitating more police intervention and a greater allocation of police resources in order to lower crime and transform neighborhoods from fear-filled spaces into assets for the city or county.
References
Basham, S. L. (2021). Community policing and the organizational structure of campus law enforcement agencies. Policing: An International Journal, 45(2), 186-199. Web.
Braga, A. A., Brunson, R. K., & Drakulich, K. M. (2019). Race, place, and effective policing. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 535-555. Web.
Brown, R. A. (2019). Policing in American history. Social Science Research on Race, 16(1), 189-195. Web.
Carter, J. G., & Fox, B. (2018). Community policing and intelligence-led policing: An examination of convergent or discriminant validity. Policing: An International Journal, 42(1), 43–58. Web.
Cossyleon, J. E. (2019). Community policing. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, 3(1), 1-5. Web.
Gascón, L. D., & Roussell, A. (2019). The limits of community policing: Civilian power and police accountability in black and brown Los Angeles. NYU Press. Web.
Giwa, S. (2018). Community policing in racialized communities: A potential role for police social work. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28(6), 710-730. Web.
Kremlin, J., & Parsons, D. (2020). Community policing today: Issues, controversies, and innovations. Sage Publications. Web.
Madsen, M., & Kammersgaard, T. (2022). Dining with the Police: Resistance and Acceptance of Community Policing. Nordic Journal of Studies in Policing, 2(1), 1-15. Web.
Malay, J. (2021). Community Policing: Misunderstanding and Misapplication Following Police Shootings. Administration & Society, 54(8), 50-64. Web.
Peyton, K., Sierra-Arévalo, M., & Rand, D. G. (2019). A field experiment on community policing and police legitimacy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(40), 19894-19898. Web.
Rahn, J. (2019). How to practice community policing on campus. Campus Security Report, 16(5), 4-5. Web.
Saharuddin, P., Albert, Y., Yudin, L., Siti, A., Salam, S. (2022). The Role of Community Policing for Law Enforcement in Resolving Issues outside the Court. Nurani Hukum, 5, 23. Web.
Tobón, S. (2021). Community policing in the developing world. Science, 374(6), 1046-1047. Web.
Williams, C. B., Fedorowicz, J., Kavanaugh, A., Mentzer, K., Thatcher, J. B., & Xu, J. (2018). Leveraging social media to achieve a community policing agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 210–222. Web.