Introduction
Immigration policies in the United States continue to change with each election, causing chaos in the legal system that deals with migrants regardless of their origin. The disputes around this topic led to political conflicts on a large scale. However, there are long-proposed policies that have support from both Republicans and Democrats, which can improve the situation with detainees, skilled workers, asylum seekers, and others without much opposition (Austin and Tobocman, 2023). It is vital to recognize immigrants’ contribution to the country’s economy. By accepting at least one of the proposed alternatives, the United States can decrease political tensions and help numerous people to become citizens.
Analysis of Alternative Policies
Revising and Expanding Immigration of Skilled Workers
The first alternative revises and expands the immigration of skilled workers, a valuable resource supporting the United States economy. It is essential to consider an easier entry path for a workforce that can give U.S. companies a competitive advantage. This alternative policy will redefine skills necessary for gaining entry by expanding the idea of what educational backgrounds are sufficient for entry.
Current admission policies are harming not only refugees but also high-skilled workers via conditions that do not reflect the actual demands of the labor market (Ellermann 2019). The academic achievements of immigrant workers must be reassessed to include people with diverse skill sets. In addition, the number of work visas for these groups must be increased to reflect statistics on redefined skilled employees.
Policy Advantages
There are several benefits to replacing policies regarding immigrant workers’ caps. This option can fix the issue of the lack of work visas, which are capped at a certain number based on arrivals from each country (National Immigration Forum 2022). Moreover, it can help employers fill out positions crucial for their operations. It can also reduce bureaucracy caused by foreign policies that create long waiting lines for people who want to work for U.S. companies (Drezner 2019).
This alternative can negate years of disputed policies that fail to achieve the intended goal. It is also essential to understand that expanding the high-skilled migrant workforce improves human capital in a non-discriminatory way by avoiding race-based quotas (Boucher 2019). The dependency on welfare among this group of arrivals is also lower since they intend to cover their expenses.
Furthermore, innovation rates within a country are positively affected by its intake of foreign-skilled employees (Bloom et al. 2019). The positive impact of migrant workers can influence public opinion regarding immigration. This policy strengthens the United States economy and its position in the global market.
Policy Disadvantages
Despite these benefits, there are cons to this alternative policy. U.S. citizens may feel threatened by skilled foreign workers who may take their positions. Moreover, defining the skill level necessary to gain legal entry into the United States may cause disputes due to the difference in educational approaches among foreign universities and colleges (Boucher 2019). It may be difficult for businesses to find fitting employees by merely judging their level of academic achievements alone. In general, navigating the labor market is bound to become more complicated (Salam, 2022). The short-term affordability of this approach may cause unexpected problems in the future.
Policy Perception by Parties
Republicans can deem this idea harmful to U.S. citizens out of fears of lowered wages and increased labor market competition. However, they are bound to appreciate the boost to the economy. In turn, Democrats will achieve their goal of expanding immigration policies, while there might be some negativity coming from their perceptions of the unfair treatment of low-skilled individuals. U.S. companies are also a part of this policy, as they will benefit from its addition significantly. Firms can gain a competitive advantage on an international scale and begin to attract more employees from abroad. Political acceptability is positive since this approach boosts the United States’ wealth.
Shifting Away from the Detention of Migrant Workers, Refugees, and Asylum Seekers
Another vital path to review is a possible shift away from the detention of migrant workers, refugees, and asylum seekers. Community-based release under supervision from social workers is a popular alternative. Considerations and tests of this approach have been in the works for almost two decades (American Immigration Council 2022). However, there needs to be more data to shift public opinion toward accepting this path despite the known benefits of this policy.
Policy Advantages
First, this change can improve immigrants’ lives significantly by allowing them to integrate into American society. These people will remain under monitoring from security services, preventing harmful activities. Second, this alternative can lift the burden from the healthcare system by allowing authorities to avoid creating crowded locations that help infections spread among the population (Ly et al. 2021). Moreover, this policy frees up resources for border control enforcement. It allows the government to improve conditions for immigrants toward more humane options.
Policy Disadvantages
It is necessary to understand that this approach also puts pressure on social services in locations where detained refugees are held. These expenditures will not be divided equally between states, which can cause an increase in anti-immigration sentiments among the population. Moreover, increased access to legal citizenship tends to correlate with hostile views on immigration among states exposed to new entrants the most (Butz and Kehrberg 2019). Therefore, this policy can lead to more negativity between political groups within the country.
Policy Perception by Parties
Aside from immigrants themselves, stakeholders for this alternative policy are Republican and Democrat supporters and politicians. Republicans are likely to perceive it negatively out of fears of increased crime rates and due to uneven distribution of expenses. In turn, Democrats will support this decision because it is an easier path to entry for people in need whose rights could not have been protected otherwise. Practical concerns include financing this initiative and the rift between voters due to its addition. However, politicians outside the affected states are likely to agree to this alternative, as it allows people in need to create a better life for themselves and their relatives.
Addressing Welfare Concerns within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
The third alternative that can help the United States resolve a portion of its problems caused by recent changes to immigration policies. The welfare of people in the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency is questioned by many citizens due to the lack of transparency (Hudak and Stenglein 2019). Therefore, it is possible to clarify which parts of the U.S. immigration system require updates by improving the visibility of the current state of things.
Censorship of data regarding places of immigrant detention, their quality, population, and other statistics prevents people from taking an informed stance on this matter (Arthur, 2022). Therefore, a policy that would ensure that no piece of evidence is hidden can sway public opinion toward more appropriate measures. A similar proposition is currently being reviewed by the government that can address delays in migrant admissions (Pinto, 2022). People’s trust in their government is a sure way to make meaningful changes.
Policy Advantages
The first benefit of this alternative is a clear path forward for future decisions. It can help prevent other errors, such as those made during the COVID-19 lockdowns, which affected public views on migrant admissions due to fears of the disease spreading (Miller et al. 2020). Furthermore, this policy can protect children of immigrants from being detained without sufficient explanation or evidence. It will also be clear how efficiently detention works and its outcomes.
Policy Disadvantages
However, there is negativity that can be expected due to this initiative. The public trust in authorities may drop significantly after the system comes online (Grimmelikhuijsen et al. 2020). Expenses on new monitoring tools will also burden the system.
Policy Perception by Parties
Both parties are likely to favor this approach. Republicans and Democrats can gain evidence for their initiatives through an updated, transparent system for documenting immigrant journeys within the country’s borders. This policy’s expenditure may arise from improving network infrastructures within detention centers and other locations. However, political acceptability among citizens will be high since it empowers the population. It is worth noting that the government is already considering this reform, making it a low-priority choice for promotion.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the United States consider changing its skilled workforce policies toward greater inclusion. This initiative resolves companies’ issues while also boosting the country’s economy. The specific steps required for this policy to work imply the need to re-evaluate academic achievements deemed sufficient for people to gain entry into the United States. For example, universities with good reputations within their countries can become as valuable in the eyes of authorities as those partnering with U.S. institutions.
Another step is to review the current applicants from the backlog under new conditions. Companies might also be required to change their organizational cultures to include new employees. Measurements of the success of this solution can consist of the rate of hiring of immigrant workers, their average salary, and shifts in the labor market.
In turn, the work of admission committees must be assessed as well. Time per review of each applicant is expected to be lower than before, yet this change must be seen in evidence. The competitive advantage that this policy promises will benefit U.S. citizens.
Conclusion
In conclusion, by pursuing the alternative path for admission of skilled migrants in the United States, the country can boost its economy and resolve many issues related to long waiting queues for work visas. A new approach to the foreign high-skilled workforce helps with innovations, gives access to more diverse employees, and removes outdated policies. Its acceptance relies on promoting an individual’s success within the country through hard work and effort. Both parties will likely perceive this idea favorably, as it benefits the United States. If this initiative succeeds, it is possible to expect an increase in favorable views on immigration among the population. Further changes to the system are required, although it is vital to avoid significant shifts that can upset the political balance of the United States.
References
American Immigration Council. 2022. “Alternatives to Immigration Detention: An Overview.” American Immigration Council. Web.
Arthur, Andrew R. 2022. “Biden’s Self-Defeating Lack of Immigration Transparency.” Center for Immigration Studies. Web.
Austin, John, and Steve Tobocman. 2023. “7 Things That Would Fix Immigration in the U.S.” Time. Web.
Bloom, Nicholas, John Van Reenen, and Heidi Williams. 2019. “A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (3): 163–84. Web.
Boucher, Anna K. 2019. “How ‘Skill’ Definition Affects the Diversity of Skilled Immigration Policies.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (12): 2533–50. Web.
Butz, Adam M., and Jason E. Kehrberg. 2019. “Anti-Immigrant Sentiment and the Adoption of State Immigration Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 47 (3): 605–23. Web.
Drezner, Daniel W. 2019. “Present at the Destruction: The Trump Administration and the Foreign Policy Bureaucracy.” The Journal of Politics 81 (2): 723–30. Web.
Ellermann, Antje. 2019. “Discrimination in Migration and Citizenship.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (12): 2463–79. Web.
Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan G., Suzanne J. Piotrowski, and Gregg G. Van Ryzin. 2020. “Latent Transparency and Trust in Government: Unexpected Findings from Two Survey Experiments.” Government Information Quarterly 37 (4). Web.
Hudak, John, and Christine Stenglein. 2019. “How States Can Improve America’s Immigration System.” Brookings. Web.
Ly, Alison, Aleta Sprague, Brianna Pierce, Corina Post, and Jody Heymann. 2021. “Immigration Detention in the United States: Identifying Alternatives That Comply with Human Rights and Advance Public Health.” American Journal of Public Health 111 (8): 1497–1503. Web.
Miller, Holly Ventura, Melissa Ripepi, Amy M. Ernstes, and Anthony A. Peguero. 2020. “Immigration Policy and Justice in the Era of COVID-19.” American Journal of Criminal Justice 45 (4): 793–809. Web.
National Immigration Forum. 2022. “Alternative Pathways for Arrivals at the Border: A Holistic Response to Increasing Migration in the Western Hemisphere.” National Immigration Forum. Web.
Pinto, Raul. 2022. “Congress Proposes the Case Backlog and Transparency Act to Tackle USCIS Backlogs.” Immigration Impact. Web.
Salam, Reihan. 2022. “Why Skills-Based Immigration Is the Best Option for America.” Foreign Policy. Web.