The judicial system of the United States is divided into federal and state courts. Federal courts deal with the cases of federal offenses, whereas the state ones hear the cases of offenses within a state. The power of judges depends on what court they belong to, and they have different appointment procedures and other conditions of service. In my opinion, federal judges have more power than state judges due to the specificity of their work.
Federal judges receive more benefits than state judges, and these benefits start with the procedure of their appointment. They are appointed by the President and approved by the Senate, while the state ones are elected for a certain period of time (“Comparing Federal & State Courts”). Therefore, federal judges are more independent from any influence than state judges and hold office for life if they commit no offenses. In comparison to federal judges, the position of state judges is not as advantageous as they greatly depend on common people.
Federal judges have more power, as well as more responsibility. State judges hear the cases related to their state laws, and their powers are limited by them (“Comparing Federal & State Courts”). The state cases include family issues and criminal cases. Federal cases are related mostly to the Constitution of the United States and international affairs. Moreover, the power of federal judges might also include responsibility for the hearings of those cases that could not be resolved on a state level.
Federal judges have more power than state judges due to the conditions of their work and different appointment procedures. The appointment for life and dealing with governmental affairs contribute to increased independence from other people as they do not elect them. Thus, federal judges have more power than the state ones and even complement their work by assisting in irresolvable cases.
“Comparing Federal & State Courts.” United States Courts. Web.