Are efforts by China’s leaders to promote security counterproductive?
Although several efforts made by the country leadership have yielded productive and exceptional results, some of the efforts that these leaders put in an attempt to promote security are counterproductive. China is a country, which has individuals with different lifestyles and cultures, as such, the efforts made by the leaders to promote security occasion mixed responses and results. The counterproductive nature of the efforts occasion because China is a large country inhabited by several people, who hail from a number of ethnic communities. Moreover, due to the inequalities presented by the economies in northern and southern parts of the country, any effort made by a leader has the potential of sparking ethnic tensions instead of yielding productive outcomes.
Thompson and Reuveny (2009) explain that the inequalities in the country increase unhealthy competition and magnify ethnic tensions. As a result, the efforts from the leaders in China are sometimes counterproductive and yield negative and unexpected outcomes.
To what extend do development requirements drive China’s foreign policy?
The development requirement of China acquires some of its major drivers from the country’s foreign policy. Although the drafting of the policy occurred several years before China became one of the leading economies in the world, the provisions in the policy are still very significant. By ensuring that its interactions with other states do not lead to interference but encourage sovereignty, the significance of the country’s foreign policy increases. Increased significance of the foreign policy transpires because countries do not like nations, which impose sanctions or exploit them. Moreover, by encouraging equality, mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence with other states, the country increases the number of nations willing to work with it. According to Hudson (2014), the foreign policy of China is a powerful tool that has great impacts on its development. As a result, the recent world has witnessed the increasing involvement of China in various development programs undertaken by African countries.
What sort of economic development does China have?
China has employed a capitalist sort of economic development, which emphasizes on the maximum utility of human resources. Principally, because the country has a large population, the amount of available human resources is high, and thus, its ability to achieve the maximum supply of products. The nature of the products that the country manufactures and sells is another factor that increases the sort of economic development evident in the country. Significantly, several products that the country deals with a range from agricultural to finished products, a factor that boosts its economic development. Harris (2014) explains that the wide spectrum of products that China produces is one of the major factors that increase its economic development. By employing the capitalistic type of economic development, the country achieves the much-desired development. Therefore, it is clear that China has a capitalistic sort of economic development that plays an integral role in its economic development and growth.
What impact would reunification have on China and on Chinese foreign policy?
The reunification of China and regions like Taiwan will be very important in China as well as on its foreign policy. By reunifying, China expands its market and increases the number of revenues and income earned from places that initially were not its business partners. Currently, China has direct flights and a number of business dealings with Taiwan. The implication of increased business dealings and partnerships between places like Taiwan and China has increased income and economic growth. In addition, the foreign policy of China compounds since its provision of peace and mutual coexistence materializes. According to Cliff and Shlapak (2007), the reunification of China and Taiwan is one of the core factors that augment the country’s economy. Therefore, the reunification of China with other regions such as Taiwan has several benefits on the country as well as on its foreign policy.
What drives China’s engagement with other Asian states?
Some of the factors that drive China’s engagement with other Asian states include economic empowerment, good business dealings, and peaceful coexistence. Evidently, Asia is a large continent characterized by dynamic and trendy economic states. These states, which include Japan, India, and Korea, are usually competing and working hard to outsmart one another. Conversely, the nations also work together by sharing resources, engaging in business dealings, and undertaking productive mutual relationships.
Although the continent is characterized by various instances of disagreements and political differences, which at times spark violence, the fact that the region is economically radical implies that the states have to engage with one another. Ganguly (2011) explains that although Asian states engage in an unhealthy competition initiated by their economic developments, they must work together in order to achieve economic growth. Imperatively, China’s engagement with other states and countries in the Asian continent hinges on business, peace, which is one of the provisions in its foreign policy, and territorial sovereignty.
Can China maintain strong economic relations alongside rising political, military tensions with other Asian states?
China can maintain strong economic relations regardless of the rising political and military tensions in the Asian continent. The ability to maintain strong economic relations with other states can be practical if China employs the provisions of its foreign policy, which promote peace and mutual coexistence with other states. In essence, maintaining a strong relationship is challenging because of the frequent instances of military engagements and unhealthy competition in the Asian continent.
However, China can still maintain good relations with its neighbors in the region by ensuring that it undertakes its activities in line with the requirements of the states, without compromising its economic demands. Sutter (2012) asserts that irrespective of the bad relationship that has existed in the Asian continent, China can still engage with the states in the region and attain economic progress. As a result, it is evident that if China employs elements like peaceful coexistence, it can successfully maintain strong economic relations with other Asian states.
Can China and the United States get along in the long term?
Over time the relationship between China and the United States will continue declining. The declining relationship in the long-term is due to the competition that China and other Asian states have with the United States and other western countries concerning regions like Africa. Over the recent past, the interest of several African states has shifted towards the Asian continent, a factor that the western countries and the United States dislike. The dislike that instigates from the competition in places such as Africa can lead to an eventual decline in the relationship between the United States and countries in the Asian continent, which includes China. Additionally, the foreign policy of China goes against the policies that many western countries and the United States employ when they work together with other countries (Saich 2011). Therefore, several countries opt to work together with states like China as opposed to working with western countries or the United States, a component that can ultimately propel poor relationships between the United States and China.
How important is the relationship between China and the United States as it rises?
Presently, the relationship between China and the United States is unimportant and non-productive because of the divergent opinions that the two countries have as China rises economically. Since the United States was actively involved in the issue concerning Taiwan, its relationship with China has declined. Shambaugh and Wang (2012) highlight that by involving itself in the case of Taiwan, the relationship between China and the United States worsened and declined. As such, it is principal to explain that the present relationship between the United States and China is not productive because of the participation that it had on the case towards Taiwan that has since divided China and several other Asian states.
Reference List
Cliff, R & Shlapak, D 2007, U.S.-China Relations after Resolution of Taiwan’s Status, Corporation Rand, California. Web.
Ganguly, S 2011, Asian Rivalries: Conflict, Escalation, and Limitations on Two-level Games, Stanford university press, California. Web.
Harris, S 2014, China’s Foreign Policy, Polity Press, Cambridge. Web.
Hudson, C 2014, The China Handbook, Routledge, London. Web.
Saich, T 2011, Governance and Politics of China, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. Web.
Shambaugh, D & Wang, Z 2012, China’s Transition into the 21st Century: U.S. and PRC Perspectives, DIANE Publishing, London. Web.
Sutter, R 2012, Chinese foreign relations: power and policy since the Cold War, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham. Web.
Thompson, W & Reuveny, R 2009, Limits to Globalization: North-South Divergence, Routledge, London. Web.