Executive Summary
The Rules-Based International Order (RBIO) has been weakened by Russia’s hostile behavior toward its neighbors and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The U.S. wants to solve this problem for several strategic reasons, such as protecting the RBIO, keeping Russia from attacking its neighbors, and promoting peace in the region.
The proposed strategy is to strengthen the U.S. deterrence posture in Europe and intensify diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict peacefully to counter Russia’s aggression. The proposed strategy will be successful if it is implemented with the cooperation of international partners.
The proposed strategy has risks and costs, such as the possibility of escalation and the financial and diplomatic costs of maintaining pressure on Russia. The U.S. will work through the United Nations Security Council to pass resolutions denouncing Russia’s actions and initiate direct discussions with Russia to ease tensions and incentivize Russia to resolve the Ukraine conflict peacefully. Regional actors such as Turkey and Kazakhstan can be involved in the negotiation process due to their regional proximity and diplomatic relationships with Russia. It is vital to strengthen Ukraine’s armed forces through Poland, Germany, Estonia, and the U.S. by helping Ukraine’s armed forces by providing it with military aid, training, and equipment.
The proposed strategy calls for extensive communication and cooperation between the United States of America and its allies. The U.S. strategy for stopping Russia’s invasion of Ukraine combines diplomatic and economic measures and backing for Ukraine’s military forces. The U.S. has a strong strategic interest in dealing with Russia’s aggression toward its neighbors and the RBIO. The United States has a vested strategic interest in addressing both issues. It combines political pressure, economic restrictions, and military deterrence to increase diplomatic pressure on Russia, strengthen regional military deterrence, and strengthen Ukraine’s defensive capabilities.
Assessment of the Situation
Assumptions
The strategy assumes that Russia can be persuaded to follow the RBIO regardless of what it has done in the past or is doing now. The proposed strategy is predicated on the assumption that Russia’s violations of European states’ sovereignty are motivated by a desire to exert influence and control over the neighbors of those states. This concept proposes that Russia may be willing to join the RBIO if its security and influence concerns are addressed diplomatically (Kanninen and Heikki 2). Russia is attempting to maintain its authoritarian regime by supporting autocrats and working to weaken democracies (Putin 182). If Russia believes a cooperative international order benefits it, it may be less likely to act aggressively.
Russia and China are expected to continue to oppose the US-led rules-based order and the UN, NATO, and the EU. However, China may assist if the U.S. takes action against Russia that does not contradict Beijing’s interests or political will (Zhao et al. 13). This theory is based on China’s desire to keep the region calm and stable (Coffey and Kochis 6). The proposed strategy assumes that Russia’s behavior can be influenced diplomatically and that addressing Russia’s national interests and concerns can lead to a more stable and cooperative international order. If Russia’s actions are not countered, these hypotheses increase the likelihood of conflict and instability.
Strategic Challenge
Importance of Maintaining the RBIO for Global Stability and Security
The rules-based international order promotes global stability by defining expectations for how nations should conduct themselves diplomatically and when resolving disputes with one another. The RBIO has played a significant role in promoting peace and prosperity on a global scale for many years (Ozili 19). The RBIO must be strengthened and maintained in light of Russia’s recent incursions into neighboring nations and Ukraine. With a solution to this issue, the RBIO will become stable, endangering global stability. If the RBIO is paralyzed, there may be a rise in international tensions and conflicts.
A breakdown in diplomatic and commercial ties could lead to a global economic downturn or even war (Bdowska-Sójka et al., 6). Smaller nations would not be able to effectively repel the aggression of larger ones due to a lack of resources (Kanninen and Heikki 3). The RBIO is in danger due to Russian incursions into Ukraine and its neighbors. By interfering with Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, Russia has violated the RBIO and other international laws and regulations. This invasion could spread to other parts of the world, threatening regional security and stability.
Working together to safeguard Ukraine’s independence and territorial integrity while holding Russia responsible for its aggression is necessary for the international community to solve this issue. With diplomatic pressure, economic sanctions, and military deterrence, Russia’s aggression must be stopped. To prevent Russian aggression against Ukraine and its neighbors, there must be international action (De Maio 21). The RBIO is a crucial international supporter of harmony, peace, and collaboration (Banka and Bussmann 7). The sustenance of the RBIO is essential in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its neighbors. Escalating global tensions and disputes may result if the RBIO is not strengthened in the face of this danger. To maintain global stability and security, the RBIO must survive.
Strategic Environment
NATO Context
In the global strategic environment, threats to national stability and security are getting complicated and linked. To do well in this tough situation, the United States must develop a well-thought-out plan using its diplomatic, economic, and military resources. The United States has long thought that its relationship with NATO would make it safer and help it reach its goals (Wolfgang 5). NATO is still the most important security alliance for the United States because it gives them a plan for collective defense and a place to work with other countries that share their values (Bond et al. 2). Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization says that an attack on one member is an attack on all. It shows how important the alliance is for preventing war and keeping peace in Europe and beyond.
The proposed strategy recognizes that NATO is important for helping the U.S. reach its goals. NATO serves as a forum for the United States and its European allies to collaborate to counter threats like Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and its neighbors. It can help the U.S. improve at stopping attacks by strengthening its military and becoming more ready. Lastly, NATO gives the United States a place to take part in diplomatic efforts to stop and solve conflicts and promote peace and stability in Europe and beyond. To back up the plan, the U.S. should put more effort into its NATO partnership and spend more money to improve its capabilities. Allies can work together to increase defense spending, military readiness, and cooperation on critical strategic issues.
EU Context
The importance of the United States’ relationship with the European Union (EU) has long been recognized in Washington. Given its large role in international trade and investment, the European Union is an important partner for the American economy. The EU must work toward a more peaceful and democratic Europe and world (Götz and Merlen 137). The proposed strategy depends greatly on the United States and the European Union working together on important strategic issues like stopping Russian aggression and stabilizing the region. The best way for the United States and the European Union to strengthen their economic ties would be to negotiate a broad trade deal (He et al. 171). The U.S. and EU could work on energy security, fighting terrorism, and cyber security.
An area where the European Union’s support would benefit the strategy is its stance toward Russia. Concerns about Russia’s aggressive actions in the region are shared by the European Union and the United States, but there are significant differences, particularly when it comes to economic sanctions (Hoijtink and Muehlenhoff 369). Foreign policy toward Russia should be better coordinated between the United States and the European Union. This category includes sanctions, energy, and political participation. The United States should prioritize its participation in NATO and the European Union to strengthen its strategic partnership. Regular high-level meetings, joint exercises, and other ways to work together can lead to a unified and consistent way of dealing with both sides’ strategic challenges.
United States Context
Since the United States is important to the global strategic environment, any proposed strategy must consider its interests, capabilities, and relationships. The United States’ foreign policy has always been shaped by its long-term commitment to democracy, human rights, and international cooperation. The United States has dealt with many big problems in the past few years. For example, China is becoming a bigger competitor, relations with Russia are getting worse, and the threat of terrorism is always there. In response to these threats, the United States has implemented some plans and policies, such as the “pivot to Asia,” increased military spending, and efforts to strengthen relationships with strategic partners (Huang par 4). The United States takes part in the strategic environment by being a part of international groups like the United Nations and the World Trade Organization. Given how much these organizations affect the political and economic situation around the world, the United States has a lot riding on its success.
Broader International Context
There are many major threats in the global strategic environment, such as the rise of China, wars in the Middle East, and the constant threat of terrorism. The international community has set up several international organizations and ways to work together in response to these threats. These include the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and regional groups like NATO and the European Union (Gunter 93). Several geopolitical and economic rivalries characterize the global strategic environment. For example, in the last few years, the United States and China have fought harder than ever to be the most powerful countries in the Asia-Pacific region and beyond (Haggard 67). Furthermore, the Ukraine conflict has heightened tensions between Russia and the West. Therefore, any proposed strategy considers the complex web of relationships that makes up the global strategic landscape.
Economic and Demographic Context of Russia
Russia’s economic woes have been exacerbated by Western economic sanctions imposed after it annexed Crimea in 2014, limiting its access to global markets. Russia faces several economic challenges, including low productivity, aging infrastructure, a weak banking system, corruption, and a reliance on oil and gas exports (Fiott 154). Russia’s government has responded to these threats by implementing import substitution, increased infrastructure investment, and economic diversification policies.
Despite the government’s best efforts, the country has not achieved sustained economic growth. Russia’s economy is susceptible to changes in international energy prices due to its reliance on oil and gas exports (Dräger et al. 32). Emerging markets, automation, digitalization, sustainability, and climate change are all global economic trends that impact the country’s economy (Trenin 7). These factors significantly impact Russia’s economic future and its ability to maintain its position as a global economic power.
The demographic makeup of Russia presents some unique challenges. Russia is the world’s ninth most populous country, with over 144 million people (Fiott 153). In contrast, the population is getting older: the median age is 40 (Trenin 6). Due to this demographic shift, the country’s workforce and social security system will likely face challenges. Currently, cities house a majority of Russians, a trend that creates new challenges for rural and small-town areas, which need help attracting and retaining young people while growing their economies (Dräger et al. 41). As a result of changing demographics and domestic and international economic conditions, Russia faces significant future challenges.
U.S. National Interests
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its neighbors has disrupted the RBIO and introduced new issues for the international community, particularly the United States. Maintaining the RBIO, preventing Russian incursions into its neighbors, and promoting regional stability are all critical to the national interests of the United States. The U.S. hopes to encourage Russia to become a good neighbor who values peace and respects international borders by reducing Russia’s long-term material capacity for war (Banka and Bussmann 16). The National Defense Strategy prioritizes preventing aggression and hostilities against the U.S. and its NATO allies and partners (Yakoviyk et al. 227). The United States is committed to this goal by preparing for and repelling strategic attacks.
An approach to the problem is to use all available power tools to arm Ukraine with the internal strength to defeat Russia. The augmented weapon packages the U.S. and NATO delivered include long-range missile strike capability, cutting-edge tank weaponry, and fighter aircraft (Minzarari and Stewart 6). Ukraine would get planes from Poland and timely intelligence and training on US-supplied equipment. The U.S. plans to use international media to spread its message and get international support for Ukraine (Minzarari and Stewart 8). It will start an information campaign to bring attention to the suffering of Ukrainian civilians and begin talks with China to put more diplomatic pressure on Russia (Haggard 45). As economic incentives to get China’s support, tariffs on Chinese imports would be lowered, and the possibility of bigger trade deals would be brought up.
The U.S. could increase the size and number of its forces in Europe by holding exercises and training programs to improve the readiness of NATO allies and partners and to keep the borders safe. The U.S. would do more exercises like Atlantic Resolve to improve training, test defense security, work with NATO countries, and find gaps in how things work together. The U.S. would deploy rotational forces to support the new training initiatives, emphasizing the presence of military force. The U.S.’s ultimate goal is to get Russia completely out of Ukraine, and China has said it supports and encourages this action. The United States can achieve this goal without launching a full-fledged war using economic incentives, media outreach, and military posturing.
Threats and Opportunities to American Interests
The strategy to boost U.S. deterrence in Europe and intensify diplomatic initiatives to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict poses both risks and potential benefits for the U.S. Russia’s demonstrated willingness to use military force to achieve its strategic goals qualifies the country as a potential aggressor. Another potential adversary is China, which is increasing its global influence economically and militarily. Non-state actors, such as terrorist organizations, also pose a threat to U.S. interests.
The United States requires a strong deterrence posture in Europe and strong alliances with key partners to counter these threats. However, there are opportunities to enhance relationships with global partners, including the European Union and NATO, to collaborate and address common security threats. Fueled by foreign aid and investment, economic growth and stability can improve regional security and reduce the likelihood of conflict.
Cooperation with Russia on issues such as preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction and combating terrorism may be possible. As a result of diplomatic efforts to end the conflict in Ukraine, opportunities for engagement and de-escalation of tensions with Russia may arise. Recognizing that opportunities and threats are not mutually exclusive and that addressing one may impact the other is critical. One example is the escalation of tensions with Russia due to the United States’ more aggressive stance in Europe. As a result, a comprehensive strategy must balance the risks and benefits, considering both the long and short term.
Problem Statement
The challenge is to create a framework that encourages Russia to behave rationally, follow the rules of the international order, and avoid future invasions of neighboring countries. It addresses Russia’s concerns and interests while maintaining regional stability and upholding principles of international order. Russia’s foreign policy and relationship with the West changed dramatically following the invasion of Ukraine in 2014. Since then, Russia has maintained its power over Europe and its neighbors by establishing a buffer zone for national security through revisionist and authoritarian methods.
Russia’s aggression has jeopardized regional stability by interfering with neighboring countries’ sovereignty, a core principle of the RBIO (Natalizia and Termine 87). The invasion has put the RBIO’s long-standing customs and practices in jeopardy. Russia’s actions endanger democracy and human rights, contradicting the notion that foreign businesses should be left alone (Noori 381). The principles of the RBIO promote cooperation, peaceful conflict resolution, and adherence to international law.
The region’s destabilization has had economic ramifications, which may have global ramifications. Europe is a global economic powerhouse, and any unrest there could have far-reaching consequences (Ozili 17). Europe’s energy security is jeopardized because it relies so heavily on Russian gas, and Russia’s aggressive behavior is a major contributor (McBride par. 3). If there are problems with gas supplies, the European economy and the global energy market could suffer greatly (Kaynak 443).
The term “electronic commerce” refers to the sale of electronic goods. The economic consequences of conflict could be felt worldwide (Götz and Merlen 143). Addressing this challenge and proposing a strategy to counter Russia’s aggression is critical. The proposed strategy should encourage cooperation, find peaceful ways to resolve conflicts and follow international law to uphold the RBIO’s principles.
Political Aim and Objectives
The political aim is to diminish Russia’s long-term material capacity to wage war and create opportunities for it to become a responsible neighbor that respects international borders while opting for peaceful negotiations. According to the National Defense Strategy, the most vital U.S. interest is protecting the homeland, NATO allies, and partners from aggression and hostilities (2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America 30). In that vein, the U.S. is dedicated to deterring strategic attacks and being ready to triumph in combat. Thus, eliminating the changing of borders by force, defense of democracies, and maintaining international peace aligns with thwarting Russian aggression in Ukraine.
Objective 1
To intensify diplomatic efforts aimed at Russia to de-escalate and find a key to peace in Ukraine.
Initiatives
- Utilizing the United Nations Security Council as a platform from which to pass resolutions criticizing Russia’s actions.
- Lowering tensions by having direct conversations with Russia.
- Offering Russia incentives to engage in a peaceful settlement of the Ukraine conflict.
- The participation of regional players, such as Turkey and Kazakhstan, in the negotiations.
Objective 2
To strengthen regional military deterrence to prevent further Russian hostilities
Initiatives
- Encouraging the rapid incorporation of Sweden and Finland into NATO.
- Deepening cooperation with international allies like the EU and North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
- Encouraging Eastern European nations like Poland and the Baltics to invest more money in defense and construct the necessary infrastructure for a military buildup.
- Mobilizing NATO for joint exercises to boost military strength.
Objective 3
To enhance Ukraine’s military readiness to discourage Russian aggression.
Initiatives
- Increase Ukraine’s access to military aid to strengthen its armed forces
- Supplying Ukraine with additional military aid in the form of weapons, personnel, and training
Ends, Ways, and Means
Objective 1: Intensifying Diplomatic Efforts to Reduce Tensions and Find Peaceful Solutions in Ukraine
Ends
The primary objective of the stepped-up diplomatic efforts directed toward Russia is the peaceful settlement of the Ukraine conflict. The primary goal of this objective is to end the fighting and prevent the situation from becoming even more precarious. It would benefit not only the people of Ukraine but also the people of the United States and the rest of the world if the conflict in Ukraine could be resolved peacefully. It is in the United States’ best interest to work toward restoring calm in Ukraine and finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict that is taking place there. An end to the fighting in Ukraine on peaceful terms would be beneficial for the relationship that is currently deteriorating between the United States and Russia. It will benefit the United States’ efforts to combat terrorism, maintain control over nuclear weapons, and keep the peace worldwide.
Due to Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, the territorial integrity of Ukraine has been compromised; restoring this integrity is a part of this mission. If the current crisis can be resolved peacefully, then Ukraine can regain control of its borders and progress toward achieving its economic and political goals. Consequently, we have an obligation to work toward easing hostilities and finding a peaceful solution to the conflict in Ukraine. It will allow for a relaxation of tensions between the United States and Russia and will also allow for the restoration of Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
Ways
The first objective of the suggested strategy is to increase diplomacy directed at Russia to reduce tensions and find a peaceful solution in Ukraine. Several strategies for achieving this goal include
- Using the UN Security Council to pass resolutions denouncing Russia’s behavior.
- Having direct conversations with Russia to reduce tensions.
- Offering Russia incentives to participate in a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
- Engaging neighboring stakeholders, e.g., Turkey and Kazakhstan, in the negotiation process.
One strategy for achieving this goal is to use the U.S. Security Council to pass resolutions condemning Russia’s aggression. The United Nations Security Council is tasked with maintaining global stability, and the resolutions it passes have significant clout. By passing resolutions criticizing Russia’s actions, the Security Council can send a clear message to Russia that the international community is united in condemning Russia’s aggressive actions (Wolfsthal and Kendall-Taylor 3). As a result, Russia may be under increased pressure to de-escalate tensions in Ukraine and work toward a negotiated settlement.
Direct talks with Russia to reduce tensions are another way to achieve the first goal. Diplomatic engagement can reduce tensions and prevent conflicts from escalating. If the U.S. is serious about resolving this conflict peacefully, it can use diplomatic channels to initiate direct talks with the Russian government (De Maio 17). Finding points of agreement and discussing potential compromises can reduce tensions. By engaging directly with the parties involved, the U.S. can clear up any misconceptions or misinformation fueling the conflict.
One strategy for achieving this primary goal is to offer Russia incentives to participate in resolving the conflict peacefully. Just two examples are financial and political incentives. The U.S. government can identify incentives to encourage Russia to participate in peaceful conflict resolution in consultation with its allies and partners. In exchange for Russia’s assistance in ending the conflict, the U.S. could, for example, offer to lift economic sanctions. The U.S. could support Russia’s diplomatic efforts to address its regional security concerns to pave the way for a more fruitful engagement.
Finally, the involvement of regional actors in the negotiation process can help achieve the first goal. Local players in a conflict are likelier to know the situation and have stronger ties to the opposing parties. If they are included in the negotiation process, the United States can benefit from their knowledge and experience in resolving the conflict peacefully. Involving regional actors also contributes to forming a larger coalition of support for a peaceful resolution, which sends a strong message to Russia about the international community’s determination to end the conflict.
The outlined strategy to counter Russia’s aggression emphasizes intensified diplomatic engagement with Russia to ease tensions and seek a peaceful resolution in Ukraine. Key approaches include involving regional stakeholders like Turkey and Kazakhstan in negotiations, utilizing the UN Security Council to adopt resolutions condemning Russia’s actions, engaging in direct dialogue with Russia to de-escalate tensions, and offering incentives to encourage Russia’s participation in a peaceful settlement. Through these means, the United States can protect its interests while also working to de-escalate the conflict.
Means
Diplomatic, economic, and military means must be used to amplify diplomatic initiatives to de-escalate conflicts and seek peaceful resolutions in Ukraine. The State Department and American embassies primarily wield diplomatic power, while the Treasury and Commerce departments handle economic incentives and the Defense Department handles military cooperation. To achieve the first goal, all of these divisions must work together.
Diplomatic efforts by the U.S. State Department and embassies are critical to achieving the first goal. Diplomats seek a peaceful resolution to the Ukrainian conflict through negotiations with Russia and other regional players. The State Department is prepared to send experienced diplomats to Ukraine and other countries in the region to seek diplomatic solutions. These diplomats can collaborate with their Russian counterparts to reach a diplomatic settlement to the conflict. The U.S. Embassy in Moscow can also make diplomatic efforts to improve communication between the United States and Russia and other regional players like Turkey and Kazakhstan.
Financial incentives are another approach to the first goal. The United States Treasury and Commerce Departments can use economic tools to persuade Russia to participate in a negotiated settlement of the conflict. Economic incentives include lifting sanctions, increased trade, and new investment opportunities. The Treasury Department can coordinate economic sanctions with U.S. allies to ensure they impact Russia’s behavior. Economic incentives could be used to encourage Ukraine and other regional countries to invest in their economies, thereby improving stability and living conditions.
The Department of Defense’s role in achieving the primary goal cannot be overstated. Military cooperation can aid in reducing tensions and creating a stable environment for diplomatic efforts. Through these efforts, the United States can coordinate military drills with regional actors such as NATO members and develop a comprehensive security strategy for the region. The U.S. Department of Defense can help deter further Russian aggression by providing military training and support to Ukraine and other regional countries. The U.S. military can assist in de-escalation and communication with the Russian military.
Increasing diplomatic efforts in Ukraine to reduce tensions and find peaceful solutions necessitates effectively using diplomatic, economic, and military tools. The U.S. Department of State and embassies can send experienced diplomats to engage in diplomatic efforts. At the same time, the Treasury and Commerce Departments can use economic incentives to persuade Russia to participate in a peaceful resolution of the conflict. Ukraine and other regional countries can be better prepared militarily to deter further Russian aggression with the help of training and support from the Department of Defense. Using these power instruments, the U.S. can achieve the first goal and reduce regional tensions, leading to a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian conflict.
Objective 2: Bolstering Regional Military Deterrence to Forestall Further Russian Aggression
End
The second objective is to strengthen military deterrence in Europe to counteract any future aggression from Russia. The U.S. intends to increase its military presence in the region to deter Russian aggression while supporting its allies. The ultimate goal is conflict avoidance and maintaining European peace and security. The U.S. hopes to maintain regional peace and security by discouraging Russia from expanding its influence or launching military aggression against neighboring countries. The result of this goal is to provide European nations with a sense of security while preventing a power vacuum that Russia could exploit. The U.S. hopes to prevent Russian aggression and maintain regional peace by establishing a solid regional military deterrent. In order to achieve common security goals, the U.S. also hopes to foster a stronger and more unified transatlantic partnership with its European allies.
Ways
The United States can improve its military posture in Europe in several ways to meet its second goal of strengthening regional military deterrence to avert potential Russian aggression in the future. One approach to achieving this goal is to advocate for Sweden and Finland to join NATO. Adding these two countries to NATO would significantly strengthen the alliance’s regional deterrence and contribute to European stability. The U.S. could assist these countries in becoming NATO members by providing military aid, training, and diplomatic support.
Increasing collaboration with international allies such as the European Union and NATO is another way to strengthen regional military deterrence. Increased security coordination and cooperation, such as information sharing and joint military drills, can help achieve this goal. A stronger and more effective deterrent to Russian aggression can be established if the U.S. and its allies work together. By encouraging Eastern European nations to increase defense spending, the U.S. could help strengthen regional military deterrence. This might presuppose pressuring these countries to purchase high-tech weapons from the U.S. and providing them with military aid and training. It will strengthen the region’s overall deterrence posture and prepare these countries to defend themselves against Russian aggression.
Participating in joint military exercises allows NATO members to hone their military skills. The U.S. can potentially lead the charge in rallying NATO forces to conduct joint regional exercises. Military readiness and interoperability are critical components of an effective deterrence posture, and these exercises would allow member states to put both to the test. To deter further Russian aggression, the U.S. needs to strengthen its regional military deterrence posture in Europe, and these measures would assist in doing so. The U.S. would be better positioned to respond to potential threats in the region if it increased cooperation with international allies, encouraged investment in defense capabilities, and conducted joint military exercises.
Means
The strategic plan’s second objective is to bolster regional military deterrence to deter further Russian aggression. Military aid and equipment, diplomatic efforts to form alliances, and economic aid and investment are all viable ways to achieve this goal. This goal can only be achieved with the assistance and equipment provided by the Department of Defense. The United States can help Eastern European countries improve their military preparedness and capacity by providing aid. These countries will receive weapons, ammunition, and other military hardware due to this assistance. The U.S. Department of Defense can also assist Eastern European militaries by educating and training their members.
The State Department’s diplomatic efforts to forge alliances will also be critical in achieving this goal. The United States can help form a united front against Russian aggression by collaborating with NATO and other regional allies. Diplomatic efforts can include discussions and negotiations with allies to coordinate military responses to potential threats and expand military cooperation and joint exercises.
Treasury and Commerce-administered financial aid and investment can achieve the second goal. By providing aid funds, the United States can assist Eastern European nations in funding their military expansion. Infrastructure projects, such as new military bases and training facilities, can be funded with this assistance. The Commerce Department can also encourage American business investment in Eastern European countries, which has the dual benefit of creating new jobs and strengthening local economies. Military aid and equipment, diplomatic efforts to build alliances, and economic aid and investment will all be required to achieve the strategic plan’s second goal. The U.S. can improve military preparedness and capacity by coordinating with NATO and other regional allies to attract investment and promote infrastructure development in Eastern Europe. If the U.S. takes these steps, it will be better able to deter future Russian aggression.
Objective 3: Improving Ukraine’s Military Preparedness to Deter Russian Aggression
End
The third goal, strengthening Ukraine’s armed forces, will help the country better withstand any future aggression from Russia. Given Russia’s track record of meddling in Ukraine, the United States understands the importance of bolstering Ukraine’s armed forces to deter future aggression from Russia. The United States hopes to communicate to Russia that any further aggression will be resisted by increasing Ukraine’s military preparedness. As a result, Russia will be less likely to carry out any further aggressive acts against Ukraine, leading to a safer and more secure region.
To this end, the United States should prioritize providing Ukraine with the military aid and support it needs to enhance its armed forces. Improving the overall readiness and capabilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces involves providing training, equipment, and weapons. Doing so will strengthen Ukraine’s ability to deter further aggression from Russia by allowing it to defend itself better from future aggression.
Ways
The third goal is to improve Ukraine’s access to military assistance to deter Russian aggression. The Ukrainian armed forces can be strengthened by providing resources such as financial aid, equipment, and supplies. The deployment of military advisors who can provide training and technical assistance to Ukrainian troops could be beneficial. The goal is to arm Ukraine’s armed forces with the knowledge and technology necessary to deter and defeat any Russian invasion.
It is accomplished by providing Ukraine with additional military aid, such as weapons, personnel, and training. Ukraine can obtain advanced anti-tank missiles, air defense systems, and uncrewed aerial vehicles from the U.S. Department of Defense. As a result, Russia’s aggressive strategy against Ukraine will be more difficult, and the Ukrainian military will benefit. The U.S. Department of Defense can send military trainers to Ukraine to teach the country’s armed forces cutting-edge tactics and strategies. It will assist Ukraine’s armed forces in preparing for a potential conflict with Russia and adapt to new threats.
In order to provide Ukraine with these resources, the United States and its European allies can strengthen their support for it. If the U.S. State Department is concerned about Russian aggression in Europe, it can work to form diplomatic alliances with countries that share those concerns. If they work together, they can pressure Russia to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Furthermore, the U.S. Treasury and Commerce Departments can provide Ukraine with financial assistance to aid its economic recovery and fortification against future Russian economic pressure. Remembering that increasing Ukraine’s military aid should not exacerbate tensions with Russia is critical. The United States must work with the Ukrainian government to ensure that any assistance is defensive and does not endanger Russia. If the United States and Russia work together, the Ukraine conflict can be resolved diplomatically.
To build a united front against Russian aggression, Ukraine must coordinate with its neighbors and regional actors. The U.S. Department of State can help deter Russian aggression by opening lines of communication with neutral countries. Another way for Washington to help strengthen regional military ties is through joint military exercises between the U.S. and Ukraine and its neighbors. Encouraging trust and cooperation among the countries will strengthen their ability to respond to future Russian aggression as a bloc. It is necessary to provide Ukraine with the necessary military aid and support, form diplomatic alliances with regional countries, and collaborate with regional actors to build a unified front against Russian aggression.
Policymakers in the United States and their alliance partners must collaborate to ensure that any defensive military assistance to Ukraine does not exacerbate tensions with Russia. The U.S. should form diplomatic alliances with neighboring states and regional actors to counter Russian aggression effectively. By taking these steps to fortify Ukraine’s defenses against any future Russian aggression, the U.S. can contribute to European regional stability.
Means
The strategic plan’s third goal is to reinforce Ukraine’s armed forces as a deterrent against Russian belligerence. The United States Departments of Defense (DoD) and State (DoS) have roles to play in achieving this goal. One of the most effective ways of achieving this goal is through the provision of military aid and equipment by the Department of Defense. It can strengthen Ukraine’s ability to deter Russian aggression by providing the country with military aid and equipment (Sullivan par 5). Weapons, armored vehicles, communication equipment, and other military supplies are all available for transfer from the United States to Ukraine. As a result of this assistance, the Ukrainian military will be better prepared to deal with potential threats to regional security.
Ukraine’s military preparedness can be improved through military aid, training, and personnel support. The Department of State and U.S. embassies can train Ukrainian military personnel in modern tactics and strategies to deter Russian aggression. The Ukrainian military can benefit from this training to improve efficiency and be better prepared to counter future Russian aggression.
The United States can assist the Ukrainian armed forces in logistics, intelligence, and strategic planning by providing personnel support in these areas. This assistance can help improve the overall effectiveness of the Ukrainian military. Another strategy for achieving this goal is strengthening ties between the United States and Ukraine’s armed forces. By establishing military-to-military ties with the Ukrainian armed forces, the Department of Defense can increase trust, information sharing, and cooperation with the Ukrainian military. These ties can help Ukraine’s military preparedness by facilitating the transfer of U.S. military know-how, strategies, and technologies.
In addition to the DoD’s involvement, the DoS can play a critical role in improving Ukraine’s military preparedness. Diplomatic alliances with other countries can be formed to aid Ukraine. The U.S. can help Ukraine’s military strength by lobbying other countries to send aid and equipment. Ukraine’s security interests can be promoted diplomatically in the United Nations and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
The U.S. Department of State can provide Ukraine with political support to counter Russia’s aggression. The U.S. can publicly support Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity while urging Russia to follow international law. The U.S. can lend Ukraine diplomatic support regarding security talks between Russia and Ukraine. The United States can promote peace and stability in the region by working to improve security conditions through diplomatic channels.
Foreign aid and investment can help Ukraine improve its military readiness. By investing in and providing aid to Ukraine, the U.S. Treasury and Commerce Departments can help its economy grow and its military capabilities expand. Ukraine’s military strength can be improved with economic aid, which can be used to purchase items such as weapons and ammunition. Another reason why investing is important is that the military can benefit from a better economy.
The third goal of the strategic plan is to support Ukraine’s armed forces as a deterrent against Russian aggression. The U.S. Departments of Defense and State (DoD and DoS) can collaborate in various ways to achieve this goal. Ukraine’s military capability can be strengthened. Russian aggression is discouraged by providing military aid and equipment, training and personnel support, military-to-military relations, diplomatic efforts, and economic aid and investment. The U.S. can play a critical role in promoting regional peace and stability by supporting Ukraine’s security interests and collaborating with other countries to improve its military readiness.
Expected Cost
Significant resources will be required to put the proposed strategy of increasing the U.S. deterrence posture in Europe and stepping up diplomatic efforts to counter Russia’s aggression into action. The majority of the budgetary support for the plan will come from military aid and equipment, training and personnel support, economic aid and investment, and diplomatic efforts. Military equipment and supplies, such as high-tech weapons, communication devices, and transportation, will be prohibitively expensive. Acquiring, storing, and maintaining these materials will incur costs. Training and personnel support initiatives at U.S. embassies and the Department of State will also require funding.
The Treasury and Commerce Departments will also require economic assistance and investment funds. The cost of providing financial assistance to Ukraine and investing in its infrastructure and economy is included. Diplomatic efforts will incur financial costs, such as hosting international negotiations and diplomat travel. Security for diplomats and international leaders, as well as travel and lodging during meetings and negotiations, will be costly.
Investing in the infrastructure needed for a military buildup may raise the cost of bolstering regional military deterrence. It includes the construction of military bases, the dispatch of troops, and the advancement of weaponry. Everything comes down to how much money the United States and Eastern European countries are willing to invest. The cost of new weapons, ammunition, and support personnel will be significant in order to increase Ukraine’s military preparedness. More ammunition, vehicles, and personnel are needed to prepare the Ukrainian military better to counter Russian aggression. The cost of this initiative will be determined after carefully considering the resources allocated for training and support.
The Risks
The proposed strategy of countering Russian aggression by ceasing diplomatic efforts to find a peaceful solution is risky. The greatest danger of this strategy is increased tension and conflict with Russia, which could lead to a military conflict. If regional military deterrence is intensified and Ukraine’s military preparedness is enhanced, Russia’s national security interests may be jeopardized, potentially leading to a military response. If the West continues to provide military aid and equipment to Ukraine, Russia may respond by providing even more military aid to separatist regions in eastern Ukraine.
Another potential risk is the strategy’s reliance on willing regional actors to participate in the negotiation process. Because of personal interests and relationships with Russia, these countries may hesitate to get involved. Their refusal to negotiate may jeopardize diplomatic efforts to end the conflict peacefully. Another significant risk of the strategy is that it will lose diplomatic leverage with Russia if it believes its interests are being ignored. Diplomatic talks could be pushed back even further if Russia believes the U.S. and its allies mistreat the conflict.
Russian forces in Ukraine or elsewhere in Eastern Europe raise the prospect of a regional military conflict. The U.S. strategy is based on deterrence, but this may not be enough to keep Russia from launching a military attack, especially if Moscow believes its vital interests are in jeopardy. It leads to a more significant military conflict, with all of the costs and consequences that entails. Apart from the previously mentioned risks, some fundamental assumptions may have needed to be corrected. For example, the assumption that the U.S. and its allies can successfully strengthen regional military deterrence may be incorrect due to the need for cooperation and participation from a diverse range of countries with varying interests and priorities. These countries will sign or follow through on their commitments to ensure the strategy runs smoothly.
Mitigation of Risks
Risks to the strategy can be reduced by preventing potential conflicts and encouraging a peaceful resolution to Ukraine’s ongoing conflict with Russia. One strategy is establishing reliable diplomatic channels through which all parties can communicate and negotiate openly. The Department of State and U.S. embassies can open these lines of communication and foster US-Russia cooperation. A strong alliance with an international partner, such as the European Union or NATO, is also essential to risk management. It contributes to a more united front against Russian aggression and increases regional military deterrence. Risks can be reduced by strengthening Eastern European defense capabilities before any possible Russian aggression. It is achieved by encouraging these countries to increase their military and infrastructure spending.
Through joint military drills and operations with NATO, it is possible to deter Russian aggression and reduce the likelihood of a military escalation. NATO members can strengthen their military preparedness and interoperability by working together and communicating to Russia that the alliance is prepared to defend its members if attacked. Economic incentives and investments can also contribute to lowering tensions with Russia and keeping the war on the horizon. Ukraine and other Eastern European countries may benefit from economic assistance and investment from the U.S. Treasury and Commerce Departments. As a result, the regional economy could improve, peace could be restored, and war could become less likely. Diplomatic efforts and negotiations can also contribute to reducing tensions and avoiding a military escalation. The U.S. State Department can take the diplomatic lead in bringing together all parties involved in the Ukraine conflict to negotiate a cease-fire.
Tests of Strategy
Suitability and Feasibility
To stop Russia from being aggressive in Ukraine and the countries around it, the plan to increase diplomatic pressure, strengthen military deterrence, and build up Ukraine’s defenses is a good one that can be carried out. It is in the best interest of the United States to work for peace, democracy, and an order based on rules that everyone is agreeable to by all countries involved. The proposed strategy may or may not work, depending on several factors. The success of these initiatives will depend on several things, such as whether or not the international community is willing to coordinate and support them, whether or not it is possible to discourage Russia without escalating conflict, and whether or not it is possible to keep pressure on Russia for a long time.
Desirability and Acceptability
There may be obstacles to the proposed strategy’s implementation due to its lack of support from political and social groups. It may be hard to keep public support for the long-term use of diplomatic pressure and economic restrictions as part of the strategy. The proposed strategy may not be well received by all parties because, for example, European allies may have different views on how to approach Russia. Concerns about the human and financial costs of maintaining pressure on Russia are also factors.
Sustainability
For the proposed strategy to work, diplomatic pressure, economic sanctions, and military deterrence must be kept up. It makes it hard to see how it will work in the long run. The proposed initiatives must be carried out well and kept up over time for the desired results to happen. Russia could find ways to avoid the pressure, keep being aggressive, or develop new plans to reach its goals. Maintaining the backing of international partners may also prove difficult, especially if different camps hold competing views on how to approach Russia best.
Counterarguments
It is critical to recognize that the current situation in Ukraine is deteriorating, with daily military clashes and casualties. Even though the situation in Ukraine is already deteriorating, increased deterrence measures and diplomatic efforts may exacerbate tensions between the United States and Russia. However, it is essential to note that the situation in Ukraine is deteriorating. The United States of America must support its allies and contribute to the region’s peacekeeping efforts.
Furthermore, the U.S. can reduce the likelihood of a further escalation in tensions by taking the proposed steps. Rather than increasing its military presence in Europe, the United States could work to strengthen ties with European allies and promote a united front against Russian aggression. Increasing the military presence of the United States in Europe is preferable. This would be a more potent response to Russia’s aggression. Militaries may participate in joint training exercises and increase intelligence sharing.
Furthermore, keep in mind that the nature of diplomatic efforts should not be used to dismiss them as ineffective or slow. The U.S. should engage Russia in substantive negotiations so that diplomacy can be used to resolve conflicts and prevent them from escalating. Diplomacy is an essential tool for preventing conflict from escalating. Despite Russia’s refusal to relinquish its land claims in Ukraine, other areas of compromise that could lead to a peaceful resolution of the conflict may exist. This is because Ukraine and Russia have legitimate claims in other areas.
It is critical to remember, particularly concerning concerns about the deterioration of relations with European allies and the weakening of NATO, that the United States and its allies share a common interest in maintaining stability and discouraging Russia’s aggressive behavior. This is especially critical in light of worries about the deterioration of relations with European partners. Suppose the United States and its European allies work together to implement a unified strategy. In that case, they can send Russia a clear and audible message that further aggression will not be tolerated.
Works Cited
“2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America.” U.S. Department of Defense, 2022, pp. 1–80. Web.
Astrov, Vasily, et al. “Possible Russian Invasion of Ukraine, Scenarios for Sanctions, and Likely Economic Impact on Russia, Ukraine, and the EU.” Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, 2022, pp. 1–29. Web.
Banka, Andris, and Margit Bussmann. “Uncomfortable Neighbors: Nato, Russia and the Shifting Logic of Military Exercises in the Baltics.” Defence Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1–24. Web.
Bond, Ian, et al. “Russia’s War on Ukraine: There Is Worse to Come (for the West as well).” Insight, 22AD, 2022, pp. 1–5. Web.
Będowska-Sójka, Barbara, et al. “Hedging Geopolitical Risks with Different Asset Classes: A Focus on the Russian Invasion of Ukraine.” Finance Research Letters, vol. 50, 2022, pp. 1–8. Web.
Coffey, Luke, and Daniel Kochis. “Finland’s and Sweden’s NATO Accession Is in the National Interest and Should Receive Senate Support.” The Heritage Foundation, 2022, pp. 1–8. Web.
De Maio, Giovanna. “Opportunities to Deepen Nato-EU Cooperation.” The New Geo Politics, 2021, pp. 1–29. Web.
Dräger, Lena, et al. “Political Shocks and Inflation Expectations: Evidence from the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022, pp. 1–54. Web.
Fiott, Daniel. “The Fog of War: Russia’s War on Ukraine, European Defence Spending and Military Capabilities.” Intereconomics, vol. 57, no. 3, 2022, pp. 152–156. Web.
Gunter, Michael. “Some Implications of Sweden and Finland Joining NATO.” The Commentaries, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, pp. 91–100. Web.
Götz, Elias, and Camille-Renaud Merlen. “Russia and the Question of World Order.” European Politics and Society, vol. 20, no. 2, 2018, pp. 133–153. Web.
Haggard, Ryan. “Russian and Chinese Conceptions of Deterrence: A Comparative Study of Revisionism and The Status-Quo.” 2019, pp. 1–144. Web.
He, Kai, et al. “Rethinking Revisionism in World Politics.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 14, no. 2, 2021, pp. 159–186. Web.
Hoijtink, Marijn, and Hanna L Muehlenhoff. “The European Union as a Masculine Military Power: European Union Security and Defence Policy in ‘Times of Crisis.’” Political Studies Review, vol. 18, no. 3, 2019, pp. 362–377. Web.
Huang, Yukon. “How the West Can Persuade China to Reconsider Its Russia Relationship.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2023. Web.
Kanninen, Tapio, and Patomäki Heikki. “Giving Peace a Chance: Towards a Negotiated Agreement in Ukraine.” Le Monde Diplomatique (English Edition), 2023, pp. 1–3. Web.
Kaynak, Akif Bahadır. “Energy Security, Armed Conflict and the Limits of Commitment Strategy: EU-Russia Relations and the War in Ukraine.” Journal of Applied and Theoretical Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 4, 2022, pp. 439–453. Web.
McBride, James. “Russia’s Energy Role in Europe: What’s at Stake with the Ukraine Crisis.” Council on Foreign Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, 2022. Web.
McKee, Martin, and Adrianna Murphy. “Russia Invades Ukraine Again: How Can the Health Community Respond?” BMJ, 2022, p. 376. Web.
McKee, Martin, et al. “How Can the International Community Respond to Evidence of Genocide in Ukraine?” The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, vol. 17, 2022, p. 100404. Web.
Minzarari, Dumitru, and Susan Stewart. The Logic of Defence Assistance to Ukraine: A Strategic Assessment, 2021, pp. 1–6. Web.
Natalizia, Gabriele, and Lorenzo Termine. “Tracing the Modes of China’s Revisionism in the Indo-Pacific: A Comparison with Pre-1941 Shōwa Japan.” Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, vol. 51, no. 1, 2020, pp. 83–99. Web.
Noori, Alireza. “The Nature of Russian and Chinese Revisionism; Iran’s Policy and Interests.” Central Eurasia Studies, 2022, pp. 371–396. Web.
Ozili, Peterson K. “Global Economic Consequence of Russian Invasion of Ukraine.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022, pp. 1–34. Web.
Putin, Vladimir. “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians.” pp. 180–201. Web.
Sullivan, Becky. “Explaining the U.S. Military Presence in Europe as 2,000 More Troops Deploy.” CapRadio, 2022. Web.
Trenin, Dmitri. “Strategic Stability in the Changing World.” Carnegie Moscow Center, 2019, pp. 1–12. Web.
Wolfgang, Richter. “NATO-Russia Tensions: Putin Orders Invasion of Ukraine; with the European Security Order in Shambles, Further Escalation Must Be Prevented.” Social Science Open Access Repository, 2022, pp. 1–9. Web.
Wolfsthal, Jon B., and Andrea Kendall-Taylor. “Arms Control and Strategic Stability with Russia.” CNAS Transatlantic Forum on Russia, 2021, pp. 1–5. Web.
Yakoviyk, Ivan V., et al. “National Security Policy in Ukraine: a Change in the System of Power Relations of the Modern World.” 2020, pp. 224–236.
Zhao, Changping, et al. “The Political Influence Pattern of the ‘Eurasia Central Region ‘Based on Syria and Ukraine Events.” SAGE Open, vol. 12, no. 2, 2022, pp. 1–16. Web.