Introduction
In recent years, there has been a significant improvement in law enforcement bodies, mainly due to advancements in technology and its application in crime prevention. Currently, several approaches, including predictive crime mapping tools, are a crucial part of the policing techniques employed in various countries. The UK police units have made progress in developing and applying technologies such as geographical information systems (GIS), predictive software analysis, spatial analysis, and even machine learning to facilitate crime detection and prevention. The utilization of the mentioned tools has become a common practice in policing.
Although the use of such tools has brought about a significant change in the police force, several claims dispute the role of technology in criminology. Some associated limitations include discrimination, as most technology relies on historical data to inform decisions. Using predictive crime mapping tools enables police to forecast the time and place of crimes; however, the application of such platforms can be biased against some communities based on the nature of the data fed into the programs.
Background of Predictive Mapping Tools
Over the years, law enforcement bodies have relied heavily on criminal behavior to assist in predicting crime. For instance, theories such as ‘Broken Windows’ in criminology were useful frameworks that could give the police a clue on which regions to watch for possible offenses. The concept asserts that signs of unorderliness suggest that misconduct cases go unpunished, thus encouraging potential lawbreakers to commit the intended crime in that particular place.
In particular, disorganized locations were treated as ‘hot spots’ for crime. Although such models were applicable and aided the police in curbing serious crimes, the offenders became more dynamic, and their tactics began to evolve. Despite the police’s efforts to reduce offenses, various criminal activities were reported. The events necessitated diverse measures to mitigate the growing misconduct cases in cities and neighborhoods.
Currently, law enforcement bodies have shifted their attention toward predictive policing. Most police departments in different countries, including the UK, have adopted data-driven methodologies. The strategies enable them to create effective crime forecasts, making it easier for law enforcement officers to intervene in the event of criminal acts. The units are using different software to predict future misconduct.
The utilization of computer algorithms capable of analyzing large amounts of data and predicting possible outcomes has enabled the police to forecast crime. The approach is deemed effective because it can prevent unlawful events. In the UK, a significant number of police departments have formed partnerships with various software developers and managers from different information systems to facilitate the application of predictive policing.
Based on the system, predictive crime mapping enables police officers to more effectively determine who and where to concentrate their efforts. Predictive crime mapping has undergone significant evolution in the past decades. The development of GIS technology and its application in crime mapping facilitated the use of predictive measures in law enforcement agencies. Rapid technological changes have further facilitated the use of different techniques to enhance crime mapping in the UK.
Various tools and approaches are currently employed to facilitate effective predictive policing in the country. Some of the techniques employed by UK law enforcement units include the use of GIS, risk terrain modeling, machine learning, visualization, and collaborative systems. The tools are vital in predicting and curbing potential crimes in the country.
The GIS Approach
In criminology, place plays a significant role, as it enables the police and the public to be aware of areas prone to criminal activity. Therefore, the need to provide accurate and reliable details about a given location prompted researchers to develop and use GIS to solve the puzzles. Based on various findings, the location of a crime and other related information can easily allow the police enforcement body to design an effective prevention approach to thwart misconduct.
The GIS technology was developed in the 1960s and has remained practical and useful in predictive crime mapping. The usage of GIS technology has been pivotal in policing practices. The tool enables law enforcement agencies to analyze crime data and identify specific patterns that are useful in forecasting criminal activities. Since the high-tech was less sophisticated, the data plotting was done manually on maps. Then the officers assessed the distribution of delinquencies from the maps.
As technology development progressed, the GIS system improved, and the law enforcement units switched to a more sophisticated computerized system to plot and analyze the available data. The advancement in technology made the whole process effective and efficient compared to the previous manual approach. In relation to the GIS, the system depicts and shows areas that experience fewer criminal activities and those that are under threat of offenses.
The key features of the GIS, including its capability to perform spatial analysis, have enabled the police to effectively explore crime data while taking into consideration geographical attributes such as population density. Using the information derived from such analysis, police officers have the potential to identify critical patterns based on the available data, thereby understanding the contribution of various aspects to criminal events in the respective location. Furthermore, GIS can reveal trends, enabling law enforcement agencies to understand the rate at which an offense is likely to occur.
The Risk Terrain Modelling Approach
As part of the predictive crime mapping approaches, law enforcement officers have adopted risk terrain modeling methods to detect and identify critical aspects of crime. The technique requires the police to utilize crime data along with significant environmental details, such as buildings or the type of business, to identify specific locations at risk of criminal activity. Through the process, the police can determine in prior organizations or infrastructures that offenders might attempt to invade. Therefore, the system maps all the possible sites, and thus the officers are made aware of such points for effective security measures. The application of risk terrain modeling facilitates the accurate identification of crime at the micro level.
Machine Learning Tools
Following the advancement in technology, machine learning (ML) has become a vital tool in the criminal justice system. Alikhademi et al. iterate that ML has significantly impacted the emerging policing approaches. The traditional methods used to forecast crime are currently less effective due to the dynamic nature of criminals. Developing a machine that the police force can use to determine and predict the chances of crime occurring is the ultimate solution to combating ever-increasing wrongdoings. ML and other tools, such as computer vision algorithms, have proven practical in their application in crime mapping.
By definition, ML is software that enables a system to learn from experience and improve accordingly without requiring extensive programming. ML is effective in interpreting information based on the given data patterns. In law enforcement, the police provide the system with crime data, which helps solve and predict complex problems.
In most cases, the officers apply supervised learning, whereby the machine is trained properly on predefined data to facilitate its ability to generate precise information when a new dataset is provided. Various ML algorithms are being used to facilitate effective crime mapping. They include decision tree regression (DTR), random forest regression (RFR), support vector regression (SVR), and multiple linear regression (MLR). The mentioned algorithms enhance efficiency in predicting crime outcomes using available data.
Most law enforcement agencies in the UK utilize the PredPol algorithm to predict crime. By using ML, the police use historical datasets to train the system. The PredPol is provided with data from the past two to about five years, which is then updated daily based on new criminal activity details from police records. The tool primarily relies on three significant data sets: the location of the crime, the type of offense, and the time of the crime, to generate its prediction.
PredPol has been considered effective since it does not require personalized information to make its forecast. For instance, it does not need demographic details or socioeconomic background to undertake its predictive role. PredPol boxes indicate specific locations with high crime risks, making it easier for the police to patrol and deter any attempt. The algorithm provides simple data that can be easily interpreted, allowing for quick action by the officers in charge.
Visualization Approach
Similarly, the UK police have been utilizing various visualization tools to facilitate the prediction of crime occurrences. For instance, law enforcement relies on heat maps, crime trend charts, and other useful frameworks that can effectively display crime data, enabling the public and officers to properly understand it. In this approach, the police normally represent different types of offenses with color or a specific code to enable them to comprehend the nature and specific point.
Collaborative Systems
Dealing with ever-changing criminal activities requires police officers to remain updated on trends, strategies, and new approaches that criminals utilize. Sometimes it is challenging for the units to focus attentively; thus, collaborating with their peers in the system is necessary. A collaborative framework enables law enforcement officers to have potential issues addressed by other departments, allowing them to continue functioning effectively.
For instance, supposing some ML algorithm does not provide the desired result, the affected agency may opt to cooperate with another one to ensure they receive the required outcome. Furthermore, police have adopted the practice of sharing sensitive data with their counterparts to prevent future crimes.
Opportunities of Predictive Crime Mapping
Effective Resource Allocation
Generally, law enforcement agencies, including police officers, encounter significant challenges when allocating available resources. Sometimes, it is challenging to determine the right location to send a given unit. With the use of a predictive mapping approach, current law enforcement officers can depict exact regions that are likely to experience crime based on the data generated by the tools. The capacity allows the body to deploy its squad directly to the ‘hot spots’ to combat the speculated crime.
In other words, instead of randomly deploying officers, the agency will use the available information to provide the exact number of police in vulnerable areas. When such approaches are undertaken accordingly, thwarting criminal acts and enhancing public safety become easier. The technique enables law enforcement bodies to effectively utilize their scarce resources, including human personnel, surveillance drones, and other valuable technologies, to concentrate their efforts on key targets.
Community Policing
Some predictive crime mapping tools can link crime to various socioeconomic activities within the community. From this perspective, the tools enable the law enforcement team to identify potential root causes of offenses and provide immediate and reliable solutions. When the officers identify and address the specific factors contributing to misconduct in society, the public may develop trust and thus improve the relationship between the officers and the community. In such a situation, preventive measures are more likely to be initiated, and people will easily comply to enhance their safety and reduce criminal activity. Therefore, being able to determine the source of the problem makes the tool essential in fighting the growing delinquency in society.
Identification of Crime-Prone Areas
Tools such as PredPol have the capacity to identify key areas that are likely to experience crime. Using ML algorithms and other sophisticated statistical analyses, police officers can analyze and depict specific locations that are prone to crime. Therefore, with such abilities, the law enforcement team can focus its resources on specific zones to ensure it provides effective preventive measures to reduce the impacts of criminal acts. Furthermore, being able to locate zones with such danger makes it easier for the police to warn the public about avoiding such places or even concerning the type of offense that is common in respective areas. By providing important warnings, the public will have adequate information and thus take appropriate measures to reduce the likelihood of becoming victims of the offenders.
Suspect Identification
Police often face a significant challenge in identifying offenders when there is no reasonable evidence to support a conviction. In most cases, it takes officers time to pinpoint the person who committed an offense. The application of sophisticated crime mapping tools, particularly those incorporating artificial intelligence, has enhanced the police’s ability to scrutinize data and identify key indicators, including crime patterns and targeted locations. Having all the details pieced together, the police department can easily run a test and check the corresponding outcomes.
With such techniques, the authorities can easily identify the individuals who participated in wrongdoing. The practice is essential because it reduces incidents of wrongful conviction that have been a frequent error in fighting criminal gangs over the years. Therefore, using crime forecasting approaches has enhanced the capacity to capture notorious criminals in the community and cities.
Detection of Crime Patterns
Generally, the size of cities or communities might make it challenging for law enforcement agencies to identify crime patterns. However, with the available crime data, the police force can plot and detect changes in the type of offense in a given region. Alterations might involve specific times of the day when the criminal activity occurs. For instance, assuming that, over the past two months, data indicates crimes are more common in the evening and the charts suddenly depict morning hours, the police can scrutinize the data to identify the changes.
With such proper insight, it becomes easier to deploy the units at specific times when the offense is more likely to occur, thereby reducing its likelihood of occurrence. The same case applies to the nature of crime in the neighborhood. Properly analyzed data will enable the police to identify a significant shift, such as a transition from burglary to theft, and thus employ strategic measures to curb these incidents.
Police Accountability
The application of various predictive crime mapping tools serves a crucial role in enhancing accountability within law enforcement bodies. Following the data depicting police activities, the police department can easily evaluate its approaches and activities toward combating crime. The agency can rely on the present details to identify areas that might have failed and take immediate action to improve them. In addition, the technologies make it easier for police officers to evaluate the duties assigned to each other, as the unit can easily trace and detect any misconduct, thereby making law enforcement teams more accountable. With such abilities, the police force will remain focused and diligent in their practices to avoid possible errors that might compromise their work.
Patrol Prioritization
Normally, various locations within the city or community demand police attention. Without proper details, it can be challenging for the officers to decide where to begin their patrol or where to station the police. However, predictive tools make it easier by identifying crime-prone locations that police must watch continuously. In other words, instead of patrolling areas less likely to experience crime, law enforcement will focus on the specific points identified by the data from the tool and then monitor them. The approach ensures enough security; hence, offenders cannot engage in wrongdoing.
Police Investigation
Generally, the police investigation is a complex process that requires sufficient data to support the presented claim. The application of predictive crime mapping enhances the ability of police officers to scrutinize available crime data, linking crucial aspects such as arrest details and the nature of the crime, to gain insight into the offense. With adequate and relevant information from crime data, it is easier for officers to trace and link various crimes to suspected individuals. Therefore, the mapping tools enhance the ability to retrieve essential details, thereby improving police investigations.
Decision-Making
Law enforcement involves several practices that require supervisors to make sensible decisions. For instance, allocating officers to various locations might be a challenge, and genuine reasons must be present to enable the deployment of more officers in one area than another. Relying on crime data has made the process smooth and effective because the police utilize the available information to inform their choices regarding policing.
Furthermore, the insights generated from the analysis are vital, especially when deciding on approaches to solve the underlying cause of crime in the city. The predictive crime mapping tools provide useful information, such as the nature of the offense and the probable time of occurrence; hence, officers can make informed decisions, including determining patrolling times and needed resources. Therefore, applying such a mechanism improves the choices leading to improved outcomes from the operations.
Effective Data Management
Generally, predictive crime mapping tools are capable of improving the quality of crime data. Law enforcement officers often find it challenging to deal with bulky data; however, the technologies make it easier for teams to effectively understand the information they are handling, thereby promoting proper data management. The level of accuracy that results from the use of such tools facilitates the law enforcement agency’s ability to formulate better and more effective preventive measures that can be used to thwart criminal activities. Therefore, tools such as ML and PredPol are significant in providing and enhancing effective management of the available crime data.
Challenges of Predictive Crime Mapping
Despite the opportunities that predictive crime mapping tools present to law enforcement agencies, various challenges are associated with their application in policing. One of the main limitations is the issue of transparency. Most of the tools used to facilitate crime mapping are proprietary and not accessible to the public. Law enforcement agencies are unwilling to share how the data are obtained and utilized, which has made the public furious with the approaches and led to distrust between the police and the community.
For instance, when individuals realize that there is increased policing in some areas and other areas are less protected, they are more likely to be confused due to a limited understanding of how the tools function. To some extent, the public assumes that there are specific locations that are being targeted by the police, and they perceive the situation as discrimination.
Furthermore, since the predictions are computerized, some areas may experience a series of police patrols, potentially leading to the stereotyping of the respective streets or neighborhoods. In such cases, assuming the location is mostly occupied by the less fortunate communities, the group will feel stigmatized, and already existing prejudice will fluctuate. In the event of such assumptions, people might rebel against law enforcement officers, and cooperation may not occur.
Additionally, some algorithms rely heavily on historical data to make the intended forecast. The aspect may promote the issue of bias since factors such as racial discrimination may contribute to historical occurrences. In such cases, the overall prediction might not be accurate as the predetermined data were based on irrelevant details. When such information is used to predict future crime, the law enforcement agency may deploy officers in areas less likely to experience criminal activities, leaving potential regions. In other words, the resource allocation might be inefficient as more effort might be directed to safe locations.
Moreover, for predictive crime mapping tools to work effectively and efficiently, they require the law enforcement team to provide a large amount of historical data, enabling the system to develop proper patterns that enhance prediction. The predictive crime mapping tools can easily produce misleading information if there is insufficient data. Furthermore, models such as ML, SVR, and MLR, as well as other platforms, require the police force to have well-trained personnel capable of interpreting predictions for proper decision-making.
In other words, the police department must subject a section of its workforce to relevant training to equip them with ML language and other important skills. The use of predictive technologies consumes a significant amount of resources to ensure that the respective team is capable of effectively applying the tools to forecast crime. Since police departments operate on fixed budgets, it may be an issue to meet the demands associated with having predictive tools.
Lastly, the results from predictive crime mapping tools can easily make the police force more reactive rather than proactive. Normally, the police officers should be at the forefront in determining remedies that generate long-term solutions to criminal activities. However, since the tools present the department with adequate information, the likelihood of focusing on the specific forecast can be higher, thereby limiting the police’s ability to analyze various aspects that might be contributing to the growing misconduct. In other words, the policing practice will be directed at preventing possible criminal acts without prioritizing the community’s problems.
How to Overcome Challenges Associated with Using Predictive Tools
To mitigate the challenges associated with the use of predictive crime mapping tools in policing, law enforcement bodies should conduct regular evaluations to ensure the accuracy of the predictions. Most, if not all, the tools rely on past data, and sometimes the details may be influenced by several factors, making the prediction biased. Therefore, to remain relevant, the police force should make it a norm to undertake thorough analysis and scrutinize the outcomes before complying with crime forecasts.
The approach will ensure that possible errors are detected and corrected before the police take any action, thereby avoiding cases of bias. In addition, the issue of transparency is raising concern from the public; therefore, it should be made mandatory for law enforcement units to provide the public with sources of data and the types of details being used to predict crime. The approach will foster trust between the police and the public, which is essential for effective policing practices.
Conclusion
Predictive crime mapping approaches have revolutionized policing practices worldwide. Advancements in technology have played a significant role in facilitating the incorporation of crime forecasting techniques. The use of crime data enables law enforcement units to predict the time, location, and even the type of offense that is likely to be committed.
The tools have proven essential, as they enable the police to allocate limited resources to regions deemed ‘hot spots’ to reduce crime rates. Furthermore, data analysis enables officers to conduct thorough investigations and identify suspects more effectively. Tools such as ML, PredPol, and MLR are crucial in enabling police to perform effective crime mapping in cities and within communities.
Even though using such a system presents the authority with significant opportunities, several drawbacks are associated with it. For instance, the software relies on past data to facilitate prediction, which can introduce bias depending on the nature of the previous information. Furthermore, the lack of transparency and the public’s exclusion from accessing the tools erode public trust in the police.
Reference List
Alikhademi K and others, ‘A Review of Predictive Policing from the Perspective of Fairness’ (2022) 30(1) Artificial Intelligence and Law 1-17. Web.
Babuta A and Marion O, ‘Data Analytics and Algorithmic Bias in Policing’ (2019). The Royal United Services Institute for Defense and Security Studies.
Buil-Gil D, Angelo M, and Samuel H. L, ‘The Accuracy of Crime Statistics: Assessing the Impact of Police Data Bias on Geographic Crime Analysis’ (2022) 18(3) Journal of Experimental Criminology 515-541. Web.
Egbert, Simon, and Matthias Leese. Criminal Futures: Predictive Policing and Everyday Police Work. Taylor & Francis, 2021.
Kumar R and Bharti N, ‘Analysis and Prediction of Crime Patterns Using Big Data’ (2019) 11(4) International Journal of Information Technology 799-805. Web.
McDaniel J. LM, and Ken P, eds. (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2021) Predictive Policing and Artificial Intelligence.
Meijer A and Martijn W, ‘Predictive Policing: Review of Benefits and Drawbacks’ (2019) 42(12) International Journal of Public Administration 1031-1039. Web.
Meško G, Katja E., and Rok H, ‘Crime Mapping in Crime Analysis: The Developments in the Past Two Decades’ (2022) Security Technologies and Social Implications 222-246. Web.
Mittal M and others, ‘Monitoring the Impact of Economic Crisis on Crime in India Using Machine Learning’ (2019) 53(4) Computational Economics 1467-1485. Web.
Neil S, Bhagat N, and Shah M, ‘Crime Forecasting: A Machine Learning and Computer Vision Approach to Crime Prediction and Prevention’ (2021) 4(1) Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art 1-14. Web.
O’Brien D. T., Chelsea F., and Brandon C. W, “Broken (Windows) Theory: A Meta-Analysis of the Evidence for the Pathways from Neighborhood Disorder to Resident Health Outcomes and Behaviors’ (2019) 228 Social Science & Medicine 272-292. Web.
Qazi N and BL William W, ‘An Interactive Human Centered Data Science Approach towards Crime Pattern Analysis’ (2019) 56(6) Information Processing & Management. Web.
Ratcliffe J, ‘Predictive Policing’ Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives (2019) 347.
Sandhu A and Peter F, ‘The ‘Uberization of Policing’? How Police Negotiate and Operationalise Predictive Policing Technology’ Policing and society 31, no. 1 (2021): 66-81. Web.
Tom-Jack, Q. T., and others, ‘The Role of Geoprocessing in Mapping Crime Using Hot Streets’ (2019) 8(12) ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 540. Web.
Wheeler A. P and Wouter S, ‘Mapping the Risk Terrain for Crime Using Machine Learning’ (2021) 37(2) Journal of Quantitative Criminology 445-480. Web.