The existence of opposing interests within a country determines the need for an instrument, allowing activists to overcome the emerging challenges for the common good. In this case, politics is the field, clarifying what methods can be used for the above purpose and how the actions of different population groups can be coordinated. Despite the apparent suitability of this term for the specified task, it is sometimes unclear what scholars mean when referring to it and, in particular, why they disagree over its meaning.
In general, the concept of politics implies the activity of leaders on the state or federal level intended for addressing the needs of citizens. In other words, this notion can be described as an area, encompassing all the aspects of societal life and providing the tools for regulating them in an efficient manner. Even though this definition seems clear, there is still no consensus reached in terms of how it can be used and what issues it might involve. This challenge is conditional upon the fact that there are numerous levels of operation of various structures, and their instruments will differ accordingly. For example, a decision which is to be made for the benefit of all the affected persons might be developed either by the government or by separate states, whereas their powers cannot be compared. It means that capabilities of corresponding entities differ, and this fact explains why there is disagreement over the meaning of politics.
In conclusion, the field under examination is a complex area which can be characterized by the presence of conflicts. It is determined as a number of instruments used for negotiating societal affairs and the feasibility of implementing one or another solution to improve the position of the country, communities, and individuals. The designed course of action is usually attributed to different levels of operations, and this factor leads to the lack of unity in people’s perceptions of this concept.