According to women’s first-hand accounts of their unforeseen pregnancies, “The Abortion Divide,” a political Frontline episode, explores the problems surrounding abortion and its contentious history. The issue of outlawing abortion is currently the subject of numerous political discussions in Pennsylvania. By state laws, several abortion providers welcome pregnant persons from around the state. Thirty-six years ago, the Women’s Health Center was a small medical facility when the interviewer taped the first program (Frontline, 2022). The merging with another clinic and the construction of a new building have led to the center’s current tremendous growth. Up to 60 individuals can be seen in the facility daily for treatment and medical professionals’ advice. Simultaneously, protesters, including doctors, Christians, and pro-life activists, wave signs outside the wall’s perimeter and implore people entering the clinic to think twice about having an abortion. The demonstrators claim that abortion is cruel, a sad act of encouragement, and a delight to the devil because unborn children have developed spiritually into human beings with souls and have not harmed this planet. Most women who choose to have abortions engage in unprotected sex and lack the financial means to raise the unborn children, and some already have children at home or in foster care. Neither the mother nor the aborted child is prepared for either option.
Freedom of speech and citizen protest is among the most important political issues. The right of women to an abortion free from outside interference comes in second, and housing and adoption services for mothers and their children are provided by the government and social organizations third. The film gathers opinions from both groups that support and criticize abortion, enabling the audience to have an overall fair reflection (Frontline, 2022). The episode about abortion has the strength of having some real stories and experiences to give the audience a sense of how it feels if they were a woman with an unplanned pregnancy. The episode’s flaw is that it does not devote enough time to discussing the most recent updates to Pennsylvania’s abortion laws; as a result, viewers are expected to have some background knowledge to understand the episode fully. It is unfair to assume that women faced with an unplanned pregnancy cannot make a thoughtful choice because, with the assistance they can access and expert medical advice, only they can determine the best course of action.
The movie was quite informative all around as it discussed what abortion is and how it is performed. Moreover, it included first-person accounts of persons who had to decide to have an abortion and of the nurses and administrators who serve as their frontline representatives. I thought Taryn and her tale to be one exciting individual. After hearing the initial information, one would be tempted to blame her for the situation and declare that she should have the kids. However, learning about her circumstances such as the fact that she is single, has two children, and works a corporate job that needs her to put in more than 40 hours per week helps the viewer comprehend why she chose to have an abortion. She engaged, she was in unprotected intercourse, and yes, b she was forced to have the child; I do not think a tiny error should determine how the rest of her life pans out. This is particularly important given that the United States is without parental leave guarantees (Frontline, 2022). If she is not given parental leave, how would Taryn sustain her two kids and the unborn twins, in addition, she is a single parent, which will make it harder for her to balance raising four children. If children grow up in unfavorable circumstances, our nation’s lawmakers have plans to slash social programs like universal pre-kindergarten, anti-hunger initiatives, and access to affordable healthcare. When Taryn described how she initially wanted to keep the abortion news to herself out of concern for how people would see her, it helped legitimize the far-right violence and abortion myths pervasive in our society.
That abortion is protected by our State constitution, in my opinion, is fantastic. From the mothers to their future children, I believe it benefits our society. Although abortion is a sensitive subject and a tough decision, the child will probably have a more challenging time if they are born into a poor environment and live in a society that does not support them or their moms. I can imagine that if mothers were obliged to have all of their children, homelessness would rise, juvenile detention facilities and the juvenile justice system would be overburdened, and would-be criminals would be attracted to low-income and underprivileged communities. My support towards abortion has been influenced by the research and my thoughts on this problem. When there are so many additional aspects that mothers must consider when deciding whether to have an abortion, I believe those with a pro-life stance see it as a simple black-and-white situation (Frontline, 2022). In my opinion, the polarization of one political party is a frightening time for civilization. Much information is incorrect, particularly when it comes to abortion. I wish our nation might pass “pro-life” laws that affect kids, the elderly, the sick, and everyone who has had to struggle with the current system.
Reference
The Abortion Divide | FRONTLINE. FRONTLINE. Web.