Prosperity and the high-quality existence of an independent country are impossible without an intelligent and well-developed public administration system. The United States of America is a fairly young state compared to the rest of the world, for example, the countries of Europe, but it is a fairly developed and powerful world player. No state can be insured against a huge number of different problems, the solution of which at the global and local levels is the government’s prerogative. The United States of America established good government from reflection and choice; however, accidents and both external and internal forces are able to emerge and create drawbacks in the state authority system.
A government is a collection of individuals or entities that looks after or governs a country or a region. Every nation has its founding documents or system of core values that it adheres to in order to rule effectively. Once constituted or created, the government is in charge of the country’s social welfare programs, the rule of law and order, defense, and financial issues. A government is the institution or collection of individuals administering a formally constituted society, such as a state. The state is compiled of three major parts: the legislative, executive branch, and judiciary in its broadest sense. Government is a tool for enforcing organizational guidelines and a system for defining policy. Every government has a constitution in a document outlining its regulating concepts and ideology. Monarchy, aristocracy, oligarchy, democracy, and dictatorship have all been historically common types of governance. The essential feature of any philosophy of governance is how state authority is attained, with electoral struggle and hereditary succession being the two main options.
The management of the United States of America is the country’s federal governmental system. The country consists of fifty states, a federal territory (the District of Columbia, where the administration is situated), five main self-governing regions, and many island holdings in North America. The federal government’s congressional, administrative, and legal departments are separated by the United States Constitution, which vests legislative, executive, and judicial authority in Congress, the presidency, and the federal courts, accordingly. Acts of Congress further clarify the powers and responsibilities of these institutions, including the formation of executive agencies and lower courts to the Supreme Court.
The central and provincial governments divide authority under the United States government, which is established on the concepts of federalism and republicanism. The fundamental distribution of authority between state governments and the federal government of the United States of America is known as federalism. Power has migrated from the states and toward the central government. Dual, collaborative, and modern federalism are all stages of federalism. The employment of the notion of the republic, or the political principles connected with it, in the United States is known as republicanism. Republicanism emphasizes personal freedom and rights as key objectives, acknowledges the people’s independence as the basis of all legal power, and opposes monarchy and hereditary political control. Furthermore, it requires individuals to be moral and true in their civic responsibilities and condemns corruption. In this situation, a citizen of the United States of America has the opportunity to feel confident and secure in the paradigm of public relations.
The state system of the United States of America is historically distinguished by a thoughtful and varied structure of agencies and institutions. Rulemaking is an essential part of American government that emphasizes the influence of institution regulations and the primary methods used by the legislature, executive officials, and national courts to manage the processes (Yackee 37). The concept of implementing verification and balances among the rights and functions of the three parts of the United States government: executive, judiciary, and legislative, is one of the Constitution’s underlying assumptions. For instance, while the legislative body (Congress) has the authority to make laws, the executive power, led by the President and Vice President, has the authority to reject (veto) any regulation. Polices and acts are then possible to be overruled by Congress. The President appoints judges to the Supreme Court, the country’s highest judicial power, but Congress must confirm such nominations. The Supreme Court, in turn, has the power to dismiss unlawful legislation approved by Congress. It can be concluded that the governance framework in the United States of America was developed with the aim of total separation of areas of responsibility.
Another factor that makes the American government successful is a bipartisan system that provides high competition and specific development paths. In the United States of America, the election system is known as a two-party process framework. That appears to mean that considering all three branches of government (legal, executive, judicial), two parties are in the authority of the political landscape. The Republican Party and the Democratic Party are the two major political forces in the United States. At the state and national levels of government in the United States of America, Democratic and Republican authorities tend to apply different approaches (Potrafke 200). The Green Party, Libertarians, Constitution Party, and Natural Law Party are examples of “external parties” in the United States of America. A two-party method has the capability of ensuring that the two major parties in power have a broad foundation that reflects the general populace. Since the two parties are substantial, each can accommodate a wide spectrum of political roles. This indicates that there may be minor differences in political opinions on various issues within each group.
done in as little as 1 hour
Considering reflection and choice, it can be stated that the American government system was designed by smart experts who, using negative experiences, were able to make new decisions. For example, the right choice was to accept the initial ramification of the power structure, which allowed the division of responsibilities and empowerment of independent institutions. In addition, one of the results of the choice and thoughtful reflection was the creation of a bipartisan parliamentary system. The main emphasis was on the confrontation between the two dominant political forces. Referring to this separation, the maintenance of a constant struggle is ensured. The possibility of seizure power by random and illogical forces and phenomena is excluded. It can be stated that since there is an availability of these fundamental features of the political system of the American government, it is balanced and diverse and has the ability to make informed choices, decisions.
What concerns accidents and force, within the framework of the action of any political system, these phenomena can manifest themselves. For instance, one of the types of political accident is the introduction of a state of emergency in the state. Not only do states of emergency indicate a major shift in the balance of power between the three levels of government, but they are also regularly stated (Bjørnskov and Voigt 110). According to the researchers, it is essential to differentiate between states of emergency proclaimed in response to a natural catastrophe and those announced in response to political instability (Bjørnskov and Voigt 110). As for natural disasters, it is impossible to be fully insured against the occurrence of these events and their terrible consequences. In a situation of political unrest, the government of the United States of America, thanks to the separation of authorities, is a fundamental and durable structure that can interchange and supplement its internal parts.
Considering the presence of various forces, it is possible to state that one of the main drawbacks in the history of the American government is lobbyism. In the United States of America, lobbying is a funded practice in which private interest organizations engage well-connected, experienced lobbyists, attorneys to fight for particular legislation in decision-making institutions such as the United States Congress. The types of government advantages organizations pursue anticipate the types of lobbyists they employ (Strickland 131). Irrespective of financial assets or limits on lobbying, corporate and government interests participate in genuinely diverse modes of advocacy (Strickland 131). This phenomenon is one of the significant shortcomings of the American government. It sets a precedent for corruption and promotes the advancement of people interested in business into public administration.
To summarize, the national government of the United States of America is the country’s federal governmental system. Due to the presence of a two-party parliamentary system and a power separation, the political system is balanced and diverse and can make informed choices and decisions. In terms of reflection and choice, it may be said that the American government system was established by knowledgeable professionals who were able to make new decisions based on negative experiences. At the same time, lobbyism is one of the drawbacks of the American government, as it sets a precedent for corruption and promotes the advancement of people interested in business into public administration.
according to your instructions
Works Cited
Bjørnskov, Christian, and Stefan Voigt. “Why do governments call a state of emergency? On the determinants of using emergency constitutions.” European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 54, 2018, pp. 110-123.
Potrafke, Niklas. “Government ideology and economic policy-making in the United States—a survey.” Public Choice, vol. 174, no. 1, 2018, pp. 145-207.
Strickland, James. “Bifurcated lobbying in America: group benefits and lobbyist selection.” Interest Groups & Advocacy, vol. 9, no. 2, 2020, pp. 131-158.
Yackee, Susan. “The politics of rulemaking in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 22, 2019, pp. 37-55.