Introduction
The “balance of power” concept in international relations asserts that countries or states seek equality. Hugo Grotius and his contemporaries formally formalized the thesis in the 17th century (Iriye 149). According to Iriye (149), political revolutionists, such as Klemens von Metternich, used the concept to maintain European peace for much of the 19th century. The theory operates on the premise that no single state should be allowed to impose its will on others. Metternich, a traditional conservative, was keen to maintain the balance of power.
However, not everyone was satisfied with his system, and a change was needed. Consequently, the international intellectual movement emerged during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, during which time the League of Nations concept was conceived (Craft 92). Nonetheless, the organization failed in its mandate to protect European peace. Its failure led to conversations among its advocates, which led to the formation of the UN (Borgwardt 15). Therefore, this essay discusses the steps that led to the conception of the UN due to the League of Nations’ failure.
The Formation of the League of Nations: Woodrow Wilson
Woodrow Wilson is credited with forming the League of Nations. Wilson played a vital role in promoting and creating the organization. As part of his vision for a new world order after the end of World War I, Wilson believed that its formation would prevent future wars (Borgwardt 16). Additionally, he was convinced that the League of Nations was crucial for fostering collaboration among nations and resolving conflicts peacefully.
The fundamental principles of forming the League included collective responsibility, peaceful arbitration, and disarmament. The organization aimed to prevent war by promoting disarmament and establishing a collaborative security system (“The Covenant of the League of Nations”). The joint security system dictated that member states were compelled to come to the aid of any member state attacked (Peters and Woolley). Moreover, the consortium sought to promote international social welfare, health, and trade cooperation.
Woodrow Wilson strongly believed that it had the potential to be an effective means of maintaining world peace. They argued it would allow nations to amicably sort out their differences (McGuire 187). Additionally, they were convinced that the consortium, through its collective security provision, would deter aggression by making it clear that any attack on its member states would be met with the brutal force of the organization (“The Covenant of the League of Nations”). Furthermore, the advocates thought that forming the League would allow for cooperation in the economic field, which faced many difficulties between 1919 and the 1940s.
However, critics of the international community contended that it was too weak to be effective. According to Borgwardt (16), the League of Nations lacked military force and relied on the member states to provide troops for peacekeeping missions. Furthermore, the League’s collective security system and the disarmament push were perceived as misguided. Additionally, it was asserted that the joint security provision depended on the member nations’ willingness to own their commitments.
Moreover, they contended that the disarmament process would render the member states vulnerable to attack (Borgwardt 16). Despite these criticisms, the consortium was seen as a significant achievement in promoting international peace. Its principles and objectives, together with the lessons learned, provided a template for forming the United Nations, the institution currently assigned to safeguard world peace.
Changes Between 1919 and the 1940s
While it is proper to claim that the League failed to prevent aggression from its member states, it is essential to note that a broader global political and economic instability marked the period between 1919 and the 1940s. Therefore, it is crucial to discuss the changes during the period that rendered the League ineffective and necessitated the discussions for the formation of the United Nations. Between 1919 and the 1940s, the period saw significant global economic and political changes. According to Craft (93), the devastation of World War 1 and the rise of the totalitarian regimes in Europe, particularly Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, posed significant threats to world peace.
One of the major causes of political instability at the conception of the League of Nations was the Versailles Treaty, which ended World War I. The treaty imposed significant reparations and territorial losses on Germany, leading to economic turmoil and political unrest within the nation (Craft 94). The rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party directly resulted from the political and economic instability caused by the Treaty of Versailles.
Additionally, the rise of fascist movements in Europe, especially Italy, presented significant threats to peace. The policies of these regimes, including the territorial expansion and persecution of minority groups, eventually led to the outbreak of World War II (Iriye 152). Elsewhere, political unrest was prevalent too. The rise of communism in Russia and the Soviet Union led to notable geopolitical tensions between the Soviet Union and the West (Craft 94). Moreover, the US and other Western powers were involved in colonialism and imperialism, contributing to political instability in Africa and Asia.
On the economic front, the Great Depression of the 1930s marked the most significant financial challenge. The global event derived partly from events in the United States and its monetary policies (Wertheim 273). The economic instability arising from the worldwide event traversed the entire globe. It led to the emergence of dictatorial regimes such as Adolf Hitler’s.
The Versailles Treaty, mentioned above, also significantly contributed to economic stability in Germany, which had a ripple effect on Europe and the global economy (Borgwardt 25). The emergence of new economic powers, notably the US, fuelled global financial instability. The stock market crash in 1929, a result of the decline in the United States economy, was the onset of the Great Depression, a significant financial challenge between 1919 and the 1940s.
Successes and Failures
The League of Nations’ main achievement was in the area of international law and dispute resolution. The organization established the Permanent Court of International Justice, tasked with settling disputes between member nations. The consortium was crucial in resolving several international conflicts, including the Aaland Islands dispute between Sweden and Finland in 1921 (Craft 97).
Moreover, it negotiated in the dispute between Greece and Bulgaria in 1925 (Craft 99). Additionally, the consortium had a significant impact on social and humanitarian issues. The organization established the International Labor Organization (ILO) to improve working conditions and workers’ rights (Iriye 153). The initiative worked to eliminate illnesses like leprosy while providing humanitarian assistance to needy communities.
Despite its numerous successes, the League failed to achieve its primary objective of preventing another world war. Further still, its lack of an effective means of enforcing its decisions and the unwillingness of some member states to comply with its provisions undermined its effectiveness. Iriye (151) asserts that the international body could not prevent the aggressive actions of Germany, Japan, and Italy in the lead-up to World War II, despite its efforts to promote disarmament and the collective security provision. On the other hand, Borgwardt (21) claims it failed to resolve several major international conflicts. For instance, it could not prevent the Italian invasion of Ethiopia in 1935, which was seen as a major test of its authority.
Furthermore, its response was limited to imposing economic sanctions on Italy after the invasion. Lastly, it failed to stop the Spanish Civil War in 1936, which was seen as a major threat to European peace (Borgwardt 23). The League of Nations’ failures led to discussions between its advocates and the United Nations. These deliberations ultimately led to the formation of the UN, the body responsible for maintaining world peace today.
Discussion on the League and the United Nations
Advocates of the League of Nations and the United Nations held different views on maintaining world peace. Each of the organizations was designed to address different challenges. The League, established after World War I, was primarily focused on maintaining stability through diplomacy and negotiation (Borgwardt 17). Its central goal was to prevent future wars through the collective security provision, where member states pledged to defend one another in the event of an attack. However, the consortium had limited power to implement its decisions. Therefore, many of its efforts to prevent conflicts were ineffective.
On the other hand, the United Nations, established after World War II, was designed to be a more robust international body with the liberty to use force if necessary to preserve global peace. Unlike the League, the UN has a Security Council with the power to authorize military action against a warring state (“Charter of the United Nations”). Additionally, it has a more streamlined decision-making process and structure, allowing for a more rapid response to global crises.
Additionally, the United Nations advocates believed that the League’s emphasis on collective security and its ability to use force made it more effective in maintaining worldwide stability. However, the critics of the UN believed its structure would be overly bureaucratic, rendering it ineffective in solving many of the world’s most pressing conflicts (Iriye 153). Despite their contrasting views, both bodies played a critical role in shaping the global order of the 20th century. However, it was agreed that the League had failed in its mandate to prevent the Second World War and that a more effective body was needed (Wertheim 269). The new body, the United Nations, took great lessons from the discussion on the League’s failures.
Lessons Learnt from the League’s Failure
The League of Nations failed to prevent the outbreak of World War I. Consequently, its shortcomings led to its dissolution. Several important lessons were learned during the discussions between the consortium and the United Nations advocates. The lessons from the deliberations shaped the formation of the United Nations and other international organizations in the following decades (Craft 92). This part of the study discusses some of the valuable lessons learned from the failures of the League.
One of the fundamental teachings from the organization’s shortcomings was that an international body tasked with maintaining world peace had to have the power to enforce its decisions to be effective. The League relied heavily on diplomacy and negotiation to resolve international disputes. It lacked the authority to impose sanctions or military actions against member states that violated its decisions (Borgwardt 15). This lack of enforcement power made it practically difficult to execute its decisions.
Secondly, the United Nations and other peacekeeping global bodies learned that an international organization needed the support of key world powers to be effective. The absence of critical world powers like the United States weakened the League (Borgwardt 16). Decisions by powerful states not to join the organization maimed its ability to implement its decisions. For instance, when Italy invaded Ethiopia in 1935, the consortium had no power to authorize sanctions on the nation due to a lack of proper support from other countries (Iriye 149). The situation worsened because Italy had grown to be a superpower under the leadership of Benito Mussolini.
In addition, the organization’s lack of flexibility and bureaucratic structure massively contributed to its failures. Its decision-making process was slow and cumbersome, making it difficult to respond effectively to emerging crises (Iriye 94). Also, the consortium’s narrow focus on resolving disputes between states was less effective at addressing other important issues. The United Nations advocates argued that it failed to address economic development and human rights issues adequately.
League of Nations Influence on the UN
After the outbreak of the Second World War, the League of Nations was abolished. However, despite its stark shortcomings, the United Nations advocates acknowledged some of its successes in maintaining world peace. For instance, the organization was crucial in promoting international economic development and human rights cooperation (“The Covenant of the League of Nations”).
The perceived successes of some of the League of Nations-affiliated programs, such as the ILO, during the Great Depression period were a point noted by the UN’s advocates (“Charter of the United Nations”). They acknowledged the League’s formation of the International Health Organization as a win. The International Health Organization and the International Labor Organization were essential in promoting international cooperation in human rights and the global economy.
The United Nations advocates also saw the successes of the League in maintaining global stability as an essential groundwork for forming a more effective international body. They contended that the organization’s effort to promote global stability through diplomacy and negotiation was vital (“Charter of the United Nations”). However, they agreed that these efforts needed to be backed by more robust enforcement mechanisms (Wertheim 271).
Moreover, they identified the collective security concept as a tenet of worldwide peace. While the principle was not entirely practical, the United Nations adopted and further developed it. An additional agreement was that the League was vital in disarmament, resolving disputes through arbitration, and promoting international cooperation in health and education. The organization’s effort to found the Permanent Court of International Justice, now the International Court of Justice, is considered a significant achievement (Wertheim 273).
On the education front, the advocates identified the International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation (ICIC) formation in 1922 as an essential step in promoting global education. Also, the United Nations applauded the League’s formation of the International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation (McGuire 186). The cooperation was necessary to promote scientific, cultural, and educational developments.
Reasons to Believe in the UN Success Where the League of Nations Failed
Those who believed in the United Nations thought it would succeed where the League failed for several reasons, beginning with the UN’s design to be a more robust and influential international body than the League of Nations (“Charter of the United Nations”). It had a more centralized structure and a more robust decision-making system, putting it in a position to take more decisive actions to prevent conflicts and maintain global stability. Secondly, unlike the League, it had the support of key world powers, including the United States (Iriye 153). The support of global superpowers gave the organization greater legitimacy and influence and a more comprehensive membership. Notably, with almost all sovereign nations included, this expansive membership helped promote greater cooperation and understanding among countries.
Moreover, a developed collective security principle compared to the one implemented by the League was critical for preventing aggression and maintaining global peace. The Covenant of the League of Nations asserts in its work that the idea was that an attack on a member state would be seen as an attack on all the member states. This concept was an improvement over the League of Nations, which failed to implement collective security effectively.
Generally, those who supported the formation of the United Nations benefited from learning from the League’s failures and successes. The supporters recognized the importance of having a more robust and influential international body that could enforce its decisions. The Charter of the United Nations holds that the formation of the Security Council under the UN ensured that it had the power to implement its decisions. Through its provisions, it is mandated to impose economic and diplomatic sanctions on countries and entities that threaten international peace and security. For these reasons, the United Nations is destined to succeed where the League of Nations had failed.
Conclusion
This essay has examined various efforts to maintain global peace and stability from the inception of the “balance of power principle.” It discussed the formation of the League of Nations after World War I and the organization’s failures that led to the outbreak of another world war. The paper has also covered the lessons learned by the advocates of the United Nations from the successes and shortcomings of the League. It has discussed the economic and political challenges that crippled the League between 1919 and the 1940s. Finally, it has demonstrated how the United Nations was destined to succeed.
In conclusion, while Metternich’s “balance of power” notion offered some stability in Europe during the nineteenth century, it was not a long-term solution to world peace. Despite its eventual failure, the League of Nations laid the groundwork for the United Nations, which was intended to be a more robust and effective international organization. Learning from the League’s mistakes, supporters of the UN developed an organization with greater enforcement capacities and international support, making it more likely to succeed in maintaining world peace.
Works Cited
Borgwardt, Elizabeth. A New Deal for the World: America’s Vision for Human Rights. Harvard University Press, 2007.
“Charter of the United Nations; June 26, 1945.” Avalon Project – Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy, Web.
Craft, Stephen G. “Saving the League: V.K. Wellington Koo, the League of Nations and Sino‐Japanese Conflict, 1931–39.” Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 11, no. 3, 2000, pp. 91–112, Web.
Iriye, Akira. Roundtable: Reflections on International Peace. 2013.
McGuire, Michael E. As It Actually Was. 2008.
Peters, Gerhard, and John Woolley. “Address in San Francisco at the Closing Session of the United Nations Conference.” Www.presidency.ucsb.edu, 1945, Web.
“The Covenant of the League of Nations.” Avalon Project, Web.
Wertheim, Stephen. “Special Section: Dumbarton Oaks in Historical Perspective.” Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 54, no. 2, 2019, Web.