Introduction
The issue of balancing forces between the Government and the states is gradually gaining more and more attention. This aspect is because problems often arise that are solved more effectively at a more local level, depending on the conditions or context of a particular region. Thus, there is a need to consider in which aspects there is a need to provide more power to the states rather than the Government.
Main Body
First, there is a wide variety of opinions regarding the distribution of forces between the states and the Government of the United States of America. The value of the investigation of this topic also lies in the fact that “people feel the Federal Government has a negative impact (53%) on the United States than a positive one (38%) (Hitlin and Shutava 4). This has become relevant when paying attention to the unequal distribution of the Government’s focus on the regions, especially those that have more social or economic problems. Research stated that “states are where the action is today on a number of key policy and values issues – abortion, gun control, marijuana, healthcare, the way in which schools teach about racism, gender theory, and sexual orientation” (Newport para 3). Therefore, this information highlights that the transfer of power to state governments can be more effective in many areas.
Several other arguments support the view of expanding the capabilities and powers of the states. Hence, in each individual state, there are certain problems that are specific to them. This may be due to historical characteristics, the pace of development, and socio-economic situations. For example, Mississippi is “the state with the highest gun violence rate per 100,000 residents in the United States, at 33.9 percent,” and the problem of teenage drug use is most critical in Vermont (Number of Gun Deaths para. 1; Kiernan para. 4). Thus, states are better equipped to address issues that are specific to their unique populations.
Another justification for the need to provide more power in self-regulation to the states is protecting minority interests. So, on the part of the Government of each individual region, there is a need to protect population groups from being overridden by a powerful federal government. In other words, it is critically important to provide individuals from minorities with the opportunity to be represented in the state, which implies including them in activities and taking into account their cultural characteristics, needs, and needs.
On the other hand, it is also essential to consider the opposite point of view regarding the distribution of forces between the Government and the states. The primary justification regarding the authority of the Government over other institutions is the fact of providing community and permanence. These aspects are formed through the formation and implementation of laws and regulations across the entire country. Thus, these measures offer the opportunity to place states in equal conditions and conditions, which should ensure their well-being and development.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this work supports the view that more rights and freedoms should be granted to the states over the Government. However, this force can effectively solve specific problems related to the population’s characteristics and the conditions of the regions. On the other hand, the provision of power to the rulers contributes to the formation of community and equality between the states, which positively affects the country’s development.
Works Cited
Hitlin, Paul, and Nadzeya Shutava. “Trust in Government.” Partnership for Public Service and Freedman Consulting, 2022.
Kiernan, John. “Drug Use by State: 2023’s Problem Areas,” WalletHub, 2023. Web.
Newport, Frank. “Americans’ Views on Federalism as States Take on More Power,” Gallup. 2022. Web.
“Number of Gun Deaths per 100,000 Residents in the United States in 2023, by State.” Statista, no date. Web.