Analysis of Utilitarianism Theory and Its Aspects

Abstract

The goal is to demonstrate that utilitarianism theory should not be used when making ethical decisions due to its massive disadvantages outweighing its strengths.

Cut 15% OFF your first order
We’ll deliver a custom Political Theory paper tailored to your requirements with a good discount
Use discount
322 specialists online

Introduction

It is important to note that utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory, where morality is derived not from the action or actor but from the outcome. Utilitarianism believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Levin, 2019, p. 137).

Reasons that Support the Thesis Statement

Inequality

According to utilitarianism, all decisions in favor of all decisions made in favor of the racial/ethnic majority would be considered moral, even at the cost of minority groups (Levin, 2019). A murderer, rapist, or even stranger is of equal value to one’s beloved wife, children, and parents.

Unpredictability of Future

Imposing the death penalty for even the smallest crimes would be plausible because it would save taxpayers’ money spent on prisons in the future. Allowing a murderer to roam free might be good if he or she would kill another murderer, who would kill even more people making the former a savior.

Immeasurability

Utilitarianism maximized happiness and pleasure, but these cannot be measured (Scarre, 2020). It is impossible to know what prevents pain and suffering and by how much.

Counter Arguments and Responses to Them

Neutrality

Neutrality might seem good, but it is a weakness because one’s loved one is more important than a stranger (Levin, 2019). It would be more moral for a parent to starve his/her child if he/she can feed two other children elsewhere.

On-Time Delivery!
Get your customized and 100% plagiarism-free paper
done in as little as 1 hour
Let’s start
322 specialists online

Simplicity

Simplicity is not good but rather a flaw because it fails to consider nuances (Levin, 2019). The argument fails when future consequences are accounted making them immeasurable.

Conclusion

In conclusion, utilitarianism theory has more weaknesses than strengths.

References

Levin, N. (2019). Introduction to ethics: An open educational resource. N.G.E. Far Press.

Scarre, G. (2020). Utilitarianism. Routledge.

Get a custom-written paper
You can get an original academic paper
according to your instructions
Let us help you
322 specialists online

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

DemoEssays. (2023, April 19). Analysis of Utilitarianism Theory and Its Aspects. https://demoessays.com/analysis-of-utilitarianism-theory-and-its-aspects/

Work Cited

"Analysis of Utilitarianism Theory and Its Aspects." DemoEssays, 19 Apr. 2023, demoessays.com/analysis-of-utilitarianism-theory-and-its-aspects/.

References

DemoEssays. (2023) 'Analysis of Utilitarianism Theory and Its Aspects'. 19 April.

References

DemoEssays. 2023. "Analysis of Utilitarianism Theory and Its Aspects." April 19, 2023. https://demoessays.com/analysis-of-utilitarianism-theory-and-its-aspects/.

1. DemoEssays. "Analysis of Utilitarianism Theory and Its Aspects." April 19, 2023. https://demoessays.com/analysis-of-utilitarianism-theory-and-its-aspects/.


Bibliography


DemoEssays. "Analysis of Utilitarianism Theory and Its Aspects." April 19, 2023. https://demoessays.com/analysis-of-utilitarianism-theory-and-its-aspects/.